JD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hesai Group has a net margin of 3.62% compared to JD.com's net margin of -3.34%. JD.com's return on equity of 15.07% beat Hesai Group's return on equity of -0.34%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $47.81, signalling upside risk potential of 51.1%. On the other hand Hesai Group has an analysts' consensus of $25.22 which suggests that it could grow by 15.37%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Hesai Group, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Hesai Group.

JD.com has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hesai Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Hesai Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Hesai Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $41.4B, which are larger than Hesai Group quarterly revenues of $72.2M. JD.com's net income of $1.5B is higher than Hesai Group's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.72x while Hesai Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.29x versus 9.14x for Hesai Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 3.62% compared to JD.com's net margin of -57.26%. JD.com's return on equity of 15.07% beat NIO's return on equity of -161.56%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $47.81, signalling upside risk potential of 51.1%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $4.74 which suggests that it could grow by 15.24%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than NIO.

JD.com has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.546, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.551%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $41.4B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $1.7B. JD.com's net income of $1.5B is higher than NIO's net income of -$947.2M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.72x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.29x versus 0.90x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDD Holdings has a net margin of 3.62% compared to JD.com's net margin of 15.41%. JD.com's return on equity of 15.07% beat PDD Holdings's return on equity of 35.57%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $47.81, signalling upside risk potential of 51.1%. On the other hand PDD Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $125.63 which suggests that it could grow by 19.58%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than PDD Holdings, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than PDD Holdings.

JD.com has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.564%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. PDD Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. PDD Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $41.4B, which are larger than PDD Holdings quarterly revenues of $13.2B. JD.com's net income of $1.5B is lower than PDD Holdings's net income of $2B. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.72x while PDD Holdings's PE ratio is 11.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.29x versus 2.79x for PDD Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 3.62% compared to JD.com's net margin of -4.2%. JD.com's return on equity of 15.07% beat XPeng's return on equity of -15.58%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $47.81, signalling upside risk potential of 51.1%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $25.74 which suggests that it could grow by 43.58%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than XPeng.

JD.com has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $41.4B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. JD.com's net income of $1.5B is higher than XPeng's net income of -$91.3M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.72x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.29x versus 2.44x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.