IIIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of -0.24% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 5.06%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 25.15% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.46%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.15%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.72%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.758% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.189%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $63.1M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $498.1M. i3 Verticals's net income of -$154K is lower than ePlus's net income of $25.2M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.54x while ePlus's PE ratio is 17.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 3.14x versus 0.89x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of -0.24% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 15.63%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 25.15% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.15%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.2%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.758% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.756, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.639%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $63.1M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. i3 Verticals's net income of -$154K is lower than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.54x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 72.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 3.14x versus 8.04x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of -0.24% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of -9.59%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 25.15% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.15%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.30 which suggests that it could grow by 13.02%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.758% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.19%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $63.1M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.1M. i3 Verticals's net income of -$154K is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.54x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 3.14x versus 4.27x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -0.24% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of -40.61%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 25.15% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.15%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 114.65%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.758% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.152%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $63.1M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $63.7M. i3 Verticals's net income of -$154K is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.54x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 3.14x versus 0.20x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.