HYFM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Agrify has a net margin of -35.49% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -302.23%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -28.31% beat Agrify's return on equity of -402.52%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 54.03%. On the other hand Agrify has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3534.89%. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agrify has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agrify offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agrify pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than Agrify quarterly revenues of $538K. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$14.4M is lower than Agrify's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agrify's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.11x versus 4.38x for Agrify. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Art's-Way Manufacturing has a net margin of -35.49% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of 23.39%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -28.31% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing's return on equity of 18.51%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 54.03%. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 185.71%. Given that Art's-Way Manufacturing has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Art's-Way Manufacturing is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.381%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than Art's-Way Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$14.4M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing's PE ratio is 5.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.11x versus 0.53x for Art's-Way Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -35.49% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -13.78%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -28.31% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 54.03%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $2.77 which suggests that it could grow by 803.85%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.541%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$14.4M is lower than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.11x versus 0.06x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vape Holdings has a net margin of -35.49% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of --. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -28.31% beat Vape Holdings's return on equity of --.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 54.03%. On the other hand Vape Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group has higher upside potential than Vape Holdings, analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group is more attractive than Vape Holdings.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vape Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vape Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vape Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than Vape Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$14.4M is higher than Vape Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vape Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.11x versus -- for Vape Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.