GDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Mofy AI has a net margin of 28.02% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 19.57% beat Global Mofy AI's return on equity of 65.29%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $44.23, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Global Mofy AI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Global Mofy AI, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Global Mofy AI.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.313, which suggesting that the stock is 68.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Mofy AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Mofy AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Mofy AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than Global Mofy AI quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $104.9M is higher than Global Mofy AI's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Global Mofy AI's PE ratio is 0.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 5.13x versus 0.11x for Global Mofy AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

9F has a net margin of 28.02% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 19.57% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $44.23, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10390.39%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than GDS Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.313, which suggesting that the stock is 68.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.01%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $104.9M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while 9F's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 5.13x versus 0.03x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a net margin of 28.02% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 19.57% beat Jianzhi Education Technology Group's return on equity of -252.25%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $44.23, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand Jianzhi Education Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Jianzhi Education Technology Group, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Jianzhi Education Technology Group.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.313, which suggesting that the stock is 68.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jianzhi Education Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Jianzhi Education Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than Jianzhi Education Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $104.9M is higher than Jianzhi Education Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Jianzhi Education Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 5.13x versus 0.12x for Jianzhi Education Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of 28.02% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of -10.58%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 19.57% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 1.99%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $44.23, signalling upside risk potential of 16.03%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $12.65 which suggests that it could grow by 43.93%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than GDS Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.313, which suggesting that the stock is 68.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.166%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $308.8M. GDS Holdings's net income of $104.9M is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$32.7M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 5.13x versus 2.07x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.