FFAI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Envirotech Vehicles has a net margin of -3252.53% compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -2376.76%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -208.67% beat Envirotech Vehicles's return on equity of -107.08%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4247688.04%. On the other hand Envirotech Vehicles has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7434.98%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Envirotech Vehicles, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Envirotech Vehicles.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envirotech Vehicles has a beta of 2.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.657%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envirotech Vehicles offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envirotech Vehicles pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are $316K, which are smaller than Envirotech Vehicles quarterly revenues of $590.6K. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -$10.3M is higher than Envirotech Vehicles's net income of -$14M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envirotech Vehicles's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 109.84x versus 2.09x for Envirotech Vehicles. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -3252.53% compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -155.79%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -208.67% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4247688.04%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.52 which suggests that it could grow by 10.18%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are $316K, which are smaller than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -$10.3M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 109.84x versus 6.92x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volcon has a net margin of -3252.53% compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -334.28%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -208.67% beat Volcon's return on equity of -326.98%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4247688.04%. On the other hand Volcon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46832768.84%. Given that Volcon has higher upside potential than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, analysts believe Volcon is more attractive than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volcon has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Volcon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volcon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are $316K, which are smaller than Volcon quarterly revenues of $736.1K. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -$10.3M is lower than Volcon's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Volcon's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 109.84x versus 0.32x for Volcon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of -3252.53% compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -3221.01%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -208.67% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -187.31%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4247688.04%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could fall by -11.5%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.926%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are $316K, which are smaller than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $640.9K. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -$10.3M is higher than Workhorse Group's net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 109.84x versus 1.13x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.