DCBO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Destiny Media Technologies has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Docebo's net margin of -6.38%. Docebo's return on equity of 44.77% beat Destiny Media Technologies's return on equity of -13.05%.

Docebo has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.94%. On the other hand Destiny Media Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Docebo has higher upside potential than Destiny Media Technologies, analysts believe Docebo is more attractive than Destiny Media Technologies.

Docebo has a beta of 1.782, which suggesting that the stock is 78.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Destiny Media Technologies has a beta of 0.772, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.85%.

Docebo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Destiny Media Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Docebo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Destiny Media Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Docebo quarterly revenues are $57.3M, which are larger than Destiny Media Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Docebo's net income of $1.5M is higher than Destiny Media Technologies's net income of -$72.3K. Notably, Docebo's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.95x while Destiny Media Technologies's PE ratio is 88.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Docebo is 4.11x versus 1.21x for Destiny Media Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ehave has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Docebo's net margin of --. Docebo's return on equity of 44.77% beat Ehave's return on equity of --.

Docebo has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.94%. On the other hand Ehave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Docebo has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Docebo is more attractive than Ehave.

Docebo has a beta of 1.782, which suggesting that the stock is 78.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ehave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Docebo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ehave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Docebo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ehave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Docebo quarterly revenues are $57.3M, which are larger than Ehave quarterly revenues of --. Docebo's net income of $1.5M is higher than Ehave's net income of --. Notably, Docebo's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.95x while Ehave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Docebo is 4.11x versus -- for Ehave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Docebo's net margin of -4.72%. Docebo's return on equity of 44.77% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Docebo has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.94%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 160.62%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Docebo, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Docebo.

Docebo has a beta of 1.782, which suggesting that the stock is 78.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.432%.

Docebo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Docebo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Docebo quarterly revenues are $57.3M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Docebo's net income of $1.5M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Docebo's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.95x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Docebo is 4.11x versus 0.78x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LeddarTech Holdings has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Docebo's net margin of -6680.99%. Docebo's return on equity of 44.77% beat LeddarTech Holdings's return on equity of --.

Docebo has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.94%. On the other hand LeddarTech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5469.61%. Given that LeddarTech Holdings has higher upside potential than Docebo, analysts believe LeddarTech Holdings is more attractive than Docebo.

Docebo has a beta of 1.782, which suggesting that the stock is 78.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeddarTech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Docebo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LeddarTech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Docebo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LeddarTech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Docebo quarterly revenues are $57.3M, which are larger than LeddarTech Holdings quarterly revenues of $166.1K. Docebo's net income of $1.5M is higher than LeddarTech Holdings's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Docebo's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.95x while LeddarTech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Docebo is 4.11x versus 1.38x for LeddarTech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.