CRNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bandwidth has a net margin of 27.76% compared to Cerence's net margin of -2.15%. Cerence's return on equity of -163.61% beat Bandwidth's return on equity of -0.32%.

Cerence has a consensus price target of $11.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.91%. On the other hand Bandwidth has an analysts' consensus of $20.75 which suggests that it could grow by 31%. Given that Bandwidth has higher upside potential than Cerence, analysts believe Bandwidth is more attractive than Cerence.

Cerence has a beta of 2.813, which suggesting that the stock is 181.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bandwidth has a beta of 1.838, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.762%.

Cerence has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bandwidth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cerence pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bandwidth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cerence quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Bandwidth quarterly revenues of $174.2M. Cerence's net income of $21.7M is higher than Bandwidth's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Cerence's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bandwidth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cerence is 1.67x versus 0.61x for Bandwidth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 27.76% compared to Cerence's net margin of -4.72%. Cerence's return on equity of -163.61% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Cerence has a consensus price target of $11.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.91%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Cerence, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Cerence.

Cerence has a beta of 2.813, which suggesting that the stock is 181.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.432%.

Cerence has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cerence pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cerence quarterly revenues are $78M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Cerence's net income of $21.7M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Cerence's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cerence is 1.67x versus 0.87x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paycom Software has a net margin of 27.76% compared to Cerence's net margin of 26.28%. Cerence's return on equity of -163.61% beat Paycom Software's return on equity of 25.86%.

Cerence has a consensus price target of $11.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.91%. On the other hand Paycom Software has an analysts' consensus of $240.82 which suggests that it could grow by 7.16%. Given that Cerence has higher upside potential than Paycom Software, analysts believe Cerence is more attractive than Paycom Software.

Cerence has a beta of 2.813, which suggesting that the stock is 181.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paycom Software has a beta of 0.773, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.669%.

Cerence has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paycom Software offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Cerence pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software pays out 16.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cerence quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Paycom Software quarterly revenues of $530.5M. Cerence's net income of $21.7M is lower than Paycom Software's net income of $139.4M. Notably, Cerence's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paycom Software's PE ratio is 32.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cerence is 1.67x versus 6.61x for Paycom Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Q2 Holdings has a net margin of 27.76% compared to Cerence's net margin of 2.51%. Cerence's return on equity of -163.61% beat Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98%.

Cerence has a consensus price target of $11.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.91%. On the other hand Q2 Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $101.26 which suggests that it could grow by 10.74%. Given that Cerence has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe Cerence is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Cerence has a beta of 2.813, which suggesting that the stock is 181.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.51%.

Cerence has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Q2 Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cerence pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Q2 Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cerence quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues of $189.7M. Cerence's net income of $21.7M is higher than Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Cerence's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Q2 Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cerence is 1.67x versus 7.80x for Q2 Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.