CORZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cycurion has a net margin of -279.74% compared to Core Scientific's net margin of -264.82%. Core Scientific's return on equity of -- beat Cycurion's return on equity of -159.42%.

Core Scientific has a consensus price target of $18.45, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Cycurion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Core Scientific has higher upside potential than Cycurion, analysts believe Core Scientific is more attractive than Cycurion.

Core Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycurion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Core Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycurion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycurion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Scientific quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are larger than Cycurion quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Core Scientific's net income of $580.7M is higher than Cycurion's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Core Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while Cycurion's PE ratio is 6.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Scientific is 9.30x versus 0.29x for Cycurion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cyngn has a net margin of -279.74% compared to Core Scientific's net margin of -16102.91%. Core Scientific's return on equity of -- beat Cyngn's return on equity of -265.89%.

Core Scientific has a consensus price target of $18.45, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Cyngn has an analysts' consensus of $1,799.99 which suggests that it could grow by 31.65%. Given that Core Scientific has higher upside potential than Cyngn, analysts believe Core Scientific is more attractive than Cyngn.

Core Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cyngn has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Core Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cyngn offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cyngn pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Scientific quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are larger than Cyngn quarterly revenues of $47.2K. Core Scientific's net income of $580.7M is higher than Cyngn's net income of -$7.6M. Notably, Core Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while Cyngn's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Scientific is 9.30x versus 7.63x for Cyngn. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines has a net margin of -279.74% compared to Core Scientific's net margin of 7.26%. Core Scientific's return on equity of -- beat International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67%.

Core Scientific has a consensus price target of $18.45, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand International Business Machines has an analysts' consensus of $269.11 which suggests that it could fall by -4.55%. Given that Core Scientific has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Core Scientific is more attractive than International Business Machines.

Core Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.643%.

Core Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Core Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines pays out 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Scientific quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are smaller than International Business Machines quarterly revenues of $14.5B. Core Scientific's net income of $580.7M is lower than International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Core Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while International Business Machines's PE ratio is 48.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Scientific is 9.30x versus 4.20x for International Business Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingram Micro Holding has a net margin of -279.74% compared to Core Scientific's net margin of 0.65%. Core Scientific's return on equity of -- beat Ingram Micro Holding's return on equity of 9.18%.

Core Scientific has a consensus price target of $18.45, signalling upside risk potential of 32.54%. On the other hand Ingram Micro Holding has an analysts' consensus of $24.08 which suggests that it could grow by 19.13%. Given that Core Scientific has higher upside potential than Ingram Micro Holding, analysts believe Core Scientific is more attractive than Ingram Micro Holding.

Core Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingram Micro Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Core Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ingram Micro Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Core Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingram Micro Holding pays out 2.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingram Micro Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Core Scientific quarterly revenues are $79.5M, which are smaller than Ingram Micro Holding quarterly revenues of $11.8B. Core Scientific's net income of $580.7M is higher than Ingram Micro Holding's net income of $77M. Notably, Core Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while Ingram Micro Holding's PE ratio is 16.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Scientific is 9.30x versus 0.10x for Ingram Micro Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.