Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
69
CFA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$88.68
Seasonality move
:
1.04%
Day range:
$87.94 - $88.74
52-week range:
$73.98 - $91.35
Dividend yield:
1.31%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
7.3K
Avg. volume:
5.8K
1-year change:
8.06%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFA
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFA
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
|
$88.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.31% | -- |
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
$76.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 0.9% | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
$71.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.32% | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
$40.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.91% | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
$87.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.64 | 0.73% | -- |
|
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
|
$71.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 0.94% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFA
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | 0.930 | -- | -- |
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
-- | 1.069 | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | 0.925 | -- | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | 1.002 | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | 0.719 | -- | -- |
|
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
|
-- | 1.017 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFA
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CFA or CATH?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFA or CATH?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has higher upside potential than Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is more attractive than Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 -
Is CFA or CATH More Risky?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.704%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFA or CATH?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFA or CATH?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is -- versus -- for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -- CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFA or CFO?
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of -- beat VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFA or CFO?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has higher upside potential than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is more attractive than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 -
Is CFA or CFO More Risky?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.227%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFA or CFO?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFA or CFO?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of -- is lower than VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is -- versus -- for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -- CFOVictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFA or KRMA?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFA or KRMA?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Conscious Companies ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Conscious Companies ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is more attractive than Global X Conscious Companies ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 -
Is CFA or KRMA More Risky?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.465%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFA or KRMA?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Global X Conscious Companies ETF offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFA or KRMA?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Conscious Companies ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Conscious Companies ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -- KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFA or POWA?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFA or POWA?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is more attractive than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF0 0 0 -
Is CFA or POWA More Risky?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.563%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFA or POWA?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFA or POWA?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -- POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFA or QLC?
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- QLCFlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFA or QLC?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund, analysts believe VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is more attractive than FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 QLCFlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund0 0 0 -
Is CFA or QLC More Risky?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.625%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFA or QLC?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFA or QLC?
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFAVictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -- QLCFlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
72
SBET alert for Jul 18
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 19.81% over the past day.
Sell
41
NEGG alert for Jul 18
Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 17.85% over the past day.
