CELH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 14.22%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.74%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.49 which suggests that it could grow by 15.9%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.475, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.543%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 139.95x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 30.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 7.91x versus 2.91x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 29.92%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.74%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.79 which suggests that it could grow by 12.3%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.785%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 139.95x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 27.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 7.91x versus 6.38x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 23.89%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.74%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $62.5096 which suggests that it could grow by 6.58%. Given that Monster Beverage has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe Monster Beverage is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.589, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.066%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 139.95x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 36.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 7.91x versus 7.84x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 10.24%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.74%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $147.65 which suggests that it could grow by 9.09%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.552%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 139.95x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 7.91x versus 2.04x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.