BWB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Busey has a net margin of 30.26% compared to Bridgewater Bancshares's net margin of -24%. Bridgewater Bancshares's return on equity of 7.69% beat First Busey's return on equity of 3.79%.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.71%. On the other hand First Busey has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.99%. Given that Bridgewater Bancshares has higher upside potential than First Busey, analysts believe Bridgewater Bancshares is more attractive than First Busey.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a beta of 0.539, which suggesting that the stock is 46.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Busey has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.516%.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Busey offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Bridgewater Bancshares pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. First Busey pays out 47.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridgewater Bancshares quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than First Busey quarterly revenues of $125M. Bridgewater Bancshares's net income of $9.6M is higher than First Busey's net income of -$30M. Notably, Bridgewater Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.79x while First Busey's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgewater Bancshares is 3.99x versus 3.07x for First Busey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Provident Financial Services has a net margin of 30.26% compared to Bridgewater Bancshares's net margin of 30.67%. Bridgewater Bancshares's return on equity of 7.69% beat Provident Financial Services's return on equity of 5.48%.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.71%. On the other hand Provident Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $20.92 which suggests that it could grow by 14.11%. Given that Provident Financial Services has higher upside potential than Bridgewater Bancshares, analysts believe Provident Financial Services is more attractive than Bridgewater Bancshares.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a beta of 0.539, which suggesting that the stock is 46.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Provident Financial Services has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.109%.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Provident Financial Services offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Bridgewater Bancshares pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Provident Financial Services pays out 87.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridgewater Bancshares quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Provident Financial Services quarterly revenues of $208.8M. Bridgewater Bancshares's net income of $9.6M is lower than Provident Financial Services's net income of $64M. Notably, Bridgewater Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.79x while Provident Financial Services's PE ratio is 15.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgewater Bancshares is 3.99x versus 2.92x for Provident Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 30.26% compared to Bridgewater Bancshares's net margin of 32.4%. Bridgewater Bancshares's return on equity of 7.69% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.71%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that Bridgewater Bancshares has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Bridgewater Bancshares is more attractive than Park National.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a beta of 0.539, which suggesting that the stock is 46.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Bridgewater Bancshares pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridgewater Bancshares quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Bridgewater Bancshares's net income of $9.6M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Bridgewater Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.79x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgewater Bancshares is 3.99x versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wesbanco has a net margin of 30.26% compared to Bridgewater Bancshares's net margin of -4.68%. Bridgewater Bancshares's return on equity of 7.69% beat Wesbanco's return on equity of 3.7%.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a consensus price target of $18.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.71%. On the other hand Wesbanco has an analysts' consensus of $37.71 which suggests that it could grow by 17.23%. Given that Wesbanco has higher upside potential than Bridgewater Bancshares, analysts believe Wesbanco is more attractive than Bridgewater Bancshares.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a beta of 0.539, which suggesting that the stock is 46.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wesbanco has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.475%.

Bridgewater Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wesbanco offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Bridgewater Bancshares pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Wesbanco pays out 64.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridgewater Bancshares quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Wesbanco quarterly revenues of $192.1M. Bridgewater Bancshares's net income of $9.6M is higher than Wesbanco's net income of -$9M. Notably, Bridgewater Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.79x while Wesbanco's PE ratio is 21.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgewater Bancshares is 3.99x versus 3.32x for Wesbanco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.