ALAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 19.96% compared to Astera Labs's net margin of 33.09%. Astera Labs's return on equity of 4.55% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 18.85%.

Astera Labs has a consensus price target of $102.76, signalling upside risk potential of 11.77%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $290.23 which suggests that it could grow by 3.36%. Given that Astera Labs has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Astera Labs is more attractive than Broadcom.

Astera Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.433%.

Astera Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Astera Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

Astera Labs quarterly revenues are $159.4M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $15B. Astera Labs's net income of $31.8M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5B. Notably, Astera Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is 417.91x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 105.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astera Labs is 30.47x versus 23.57x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FTC Solar has a net margin of 19.96% compared to Astera Labs's net margin of -18.36%. Astera Labs's return on equity of 4.55% beat FTC Solar's return on equity of -132.79%.

Astera Labs has a consensus price target of $102.76, signalling upside risk potential of 11.77%. On the other hand FTC Solar has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could fall by -10.46%. Given that Astera Labs has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, analysts believe Astera Labs is more attractive than FTC Solar.

Astera Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Astera Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FTC Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astera Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FTC Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astera Labs quarterly revenues are $159.4M, which are larger than FTC Solar quarterly revenues of $20.8M. Astera Labs's net income of $31.8M is higher than FTC Solar's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Astera Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is 417.91x while FTC Solar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astera Labs is 30.47x versus 1.15x for FTC Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 19.96% compared to Astera Labs's net margin of 9.39%. Astera Labs's return on equity of 4.55% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Astera Labs has a consensus price target of $102.76, signalling upside risk potential of 11.77%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $90.27 which suggests that it could grow by 27.41%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Astera Labs, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Astera Labs.

Astera Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.355%.

Astera Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Astera Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Astera Labs quarterly revenues are $159.4M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Astera Labs's net income of $31.8M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Astera Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is 417.91x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astera Labs is 30.47x versus 9.46x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 19.96% compared to Astera Labs's net margin of 42.61%. Astera Labs's return on equity of 4.55% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Astera Labs has a consensus price target of $102.76, signalling upside risk potential of 11.77%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.06 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that Astera Labs has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Astera Labs is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Astera Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Astera Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Astera Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Astera Labs quarterly revenues are $159.4M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Astera Labs's net income of $31.8M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Astera Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is 417.91x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astera Labs is 30.47x versus 28.54x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.