GRMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SEALSQ has a net margin of 21.68% compared to Garmin's net margin of --. Garmin's return on equity of 19.43% beat SEALSQ's return on equity of -72.18%.

Garmin has a consensus price target of $202.92, signalling downside risk potential of -10.96%. On the other hand SEALSQ has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 60%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than Garmin, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than Garmin.

Garmin has a beta of 0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 3.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Garmin has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. SEALSQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garmin pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. SEALSQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garmin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garmin quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than SEALSQ quarterly revenues of --. Garmin's net income of $332.8M is higher than SEALSQ's net income of --. Notably, Garmin's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.99x while SEALSQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garmin is 6.84x versus 9.48x for SEALSQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logitech International SA has a net margin of 21.68% compared to Garmin's net margin of 14.26%. Garmin's return on equity of 19.43% beat Logitech International SA's return on equity of 29.17%.

Garmin has a consensus price target of $202.92, signalling downside risk potential of -10.96%. On the other hand Logitech International SA has an analysts' consensus of $90.56 which suggests that it could fall by -5.39%. Given that Garmin has more downside risk than Logitech International SA, analysts believe Logitech International SA is more attractive than Garmin.

Garmin has a beta of 0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 3.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logitech International SA has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.825%.

Garmin has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Logitech International SA offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Garmin pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA pays out 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garmin quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Logitech International SA quarterly revenues of $1B. Garmin's net income of $332.8M is higher than Logitech International SA's net income of $144.1M. Notably, Garmin's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.99x while Logitech International SA's PE ratio is 23.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garmin is 6.84x versus 3.21x for Logitech International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportradar Group AG has a net margin of 21.68% compared to Garmin's net margin of 7.78%. Garmin's return on equity of 19.43% beat Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 6.46%.

Garmin has a consensus price target of $202.92, signalling downside risk potential of -10.96%. On the other hand Sportradar Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $30.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.37%. Given that Sportradar Group AG has higher upside potential than Garmin, analysts believe Sportradar Group AG is more attractive than Garmin.

Garmin has a beta of 0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 3.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Garmin has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Sportradar Group AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garmin pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Sportradar Group AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garmin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garmin quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues of $327.5M. Garmin's net income of $332.8M is higher than Sportradar Group AG's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Garmin's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.99x while Sportradar Group AG's PE ratio is 159.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garmin is 6.84x versus 7.83x for Sportradar Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WISeKey International Holding has a net margin of 21.68% compared to Garmin's net margin of --. Garmin's return on equity of 19.43% beat WISeKey International Holding's return on equity of -88.78%.

Garmin has a consensus price target of $202.92, signalling downside risk potential of -10.96%. On the other hand WISeKey International Holding has an analysts' consensus of $7.06 which suggests that it could grow by 8.29%. Given that WISeKey International Holding has higher upside potential than Garmin, analysts believe WISeKey International Holding is more attractive than Garmin.

Garmin has a beta of 0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 3.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WISeKey International Holding has a beta of 1.478, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.75%.

Garmin has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. WISeKey International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garmin pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. WISeKey International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garmin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garmin quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than WISeKey International Holding quarterly revenues of --. Garmin's net income of $332.8M is higher than WISeKey International Holding's net income of --. Notably, Garmin's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.99x while WISeKey International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garmin is 6.84x versus 5.38x for WISeKey International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.