DNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 24.68%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.15, signalling upside risk potential of 0.55%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $198.59 which suggests that it could grow by 9.89%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.069%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 37.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.65x versus 8.54x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 32.48%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.49%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.15, signalling upside risk potential of 0.55%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $512.49 which suggests that it could grow by 2.52%. Given that Moodys has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Moodys is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.928%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than Moodys's net income of $625M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Moodys's PE ratio is 43.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.65x versus 12.59x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 13.49%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat Morningstar's return on equity of 25.24%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.15, signalling upside risk potential of 0.55%. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of $341.67 which suggests that it could grow by 18.42%. Given that Morningstar has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Morningstar is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.312%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $581.9M. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than Morningstar's net income of $78.5M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Morningstar's PE ratio is 32.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.65x versus 5.38x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of -2.73% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 28.86%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.15, signalling upside risk potential of 0.55%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $593.49 which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.844%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $579.8M, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while S&P Global's PE ratio is 41.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 1.65x versus 11.23x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.