APH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enphase Energy has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 8.35%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $99.08, signalling downside risk potential of -4.13%. On the other hand Enphase Energy has an analysts' consensus of $48.37 which suggests that it could grow by 22.2%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.965%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Enphase Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Enphase Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Enphase Energy quarterly revenues of $356.1M. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is higher than Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.17x while Enphase Energy's PE ratio is 36.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 7.80x versus 3.92x for Enphase Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -768.06%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -98.68%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $99.08, signalling downside risk potential of -4.13%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 334.78%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.491, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.106%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.17x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 7.80x versus 16.62x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 42.61%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $99.08, signalling downside risk potential of -4.13%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.55 which suggests that it could grow by 4.14%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.17x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 7.80x versus 28.71x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TE Connectivity PLC has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 0.31%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat TE Connectivity PLC's return on equity of 11.11%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $99.08, signalling downside risk potential of -4.13%. On the other hand TE Connectivity PLC has an analysts' consensus of $180.18 which suggests that it could grow by 0.68%. Given that TE Connectivity PLC has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe TE Connectivity PLC is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TE Connectivity PLC has a beta of 1.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.823%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. TE Connectivity PLC offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. TE Connectivity PLC pays out 23.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than TE Connectivity PLC quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is higher than TE Connectivity PLC's net income of $13M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.17x while TE Connectivity PLC's PE ratio is 39.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 7.80x versus 3.39x for TE Connectivity PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.