VLVLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of 6.03% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 15.44%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 20.3% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 27.18%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.28%. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.355, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.541%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Volvo AB pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 45.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4B. Volvo AB's net income of $767.8M is higher than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $618.6M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 27.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.12x versus 4.50x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Husqvarna AB has a net margin of 6.03% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 6.6%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 20.3% beat Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 3.85%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.28%. On the other hand Husqvarna AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.629%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Husqvarna AB offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Volvo AB pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB pays out 129.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Volvo AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Husqvarna AB's is not.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Volvo AB's net income of $767.8M is higher than Husqvarna AB's net income of $90.9M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while Husqvarna AB's PE ratio is 34.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.12x versus 0.69x for Husqvarna AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik AB has a net margin of 6.03% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 10.83%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 20.3% beat Sandvik AB's return on equity of 15.62%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.28%. On the other hand Sandvik AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Sandvik AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik AB has a beta of 1.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.437%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Sandvik AB offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Volvo AB pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik AB pays out 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than Sandvik AB quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Volvo AB's net income of $767.8M is higher than Sandvik AB's net income of $333.2M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while Sandvik AB's PE ratio is 22.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.12x versus 2.62x for Sandvik AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SKF AB has a net margin of 6.03% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 7.49%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 20.3% beat SKF AB's return on equity of 10.6%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.28%. On the other hand SKF AB has an analysts' consensus of $22.40 which suggests that it could fall by -6.98%. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than SKF AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than SKF AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SKF AB has a beta of 1.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.014%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. SKF AB offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Volvo AB pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB pays out 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $12.7B, which are larger than SKF AB quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Volvo AB's net income of $767.8M is higher than SKF AB's net income of $168.4M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while SKF AB's PE ratio is 18.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.12x versus 1.19x for SKF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.