SSUMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Sumitomo's net margin of 5.8%. Sumitomo's return on equity of 11.58% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.61%.

Sumitomo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of $62.80 which suggests that it could grow by 16.06%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Sumitomo, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Sumitomo.

Sumitomo has a beta of 0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 38.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.919%.

Sumitomo has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Sumitomo pays 27.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sumitomo quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Sumitomo's net income of $1.1B is higher than Kubota's net income of $271.1M. Notably, Sumitomo's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.13x while Kubota's PE ratio is 7.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sumitomo is 0.63x versus 0.63x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Sumitomo's net margin of -3.6%. Sumitomo's return on equity of 11.58% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

Sumitomo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $12.32 which suggests that it could grow by 14.37%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Sumitomo, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Sumitomo.

Sumitomo has a beta of 0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 38.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.335%.

Sumitomo has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Kyocera offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Sumitomo pays 27.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Sumitomo quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Sumitomo's net income of $1.1B is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Sumitomo's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.13x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 92.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sumitomo is 0.63x versus 1.13x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robot Consulting has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Sumitomo's net margin of --. Sumitomo's return on equity of 11.58% beat Robot Consulting's return on equity of --.

Sumitomo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Robot Consulting has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sumitomo has higher upside potential than Robot Consulting, analysts believe Sumitomo is more attractive than Robot Consulting.

Sumitomo has a beta of 0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 38.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robot Consulting has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sumitomo has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Robot Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sumitomo pays 27.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Robot Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sumitomo quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than Robot Consulting quarterly revenues of --. Sumitomo's net income of $1.1B is higher than Robot Consulting's net income of --. Notably, Sumitomo's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.13x while Robot Consulting's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sumitomo is 0.63x versus -- for Robot Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Sumitomo's net margin of --. Sumitomo's return on equity of 11.58% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Sumitomo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sumitomo has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Sumitomo is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Sumitomo has a beta of 0.614, which suggesting that the stock is 38.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sumitomo has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sumitomo pays 27.59% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sumitomo quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Sumitomo's net income of $1.1B is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Sumitomo's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.13x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sumitomo is 0.63x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.