SJMHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NFT has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of --. SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03% beat NFT's return on equity of --.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SJM Holdings has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe SJM Holdings is more attractive than NFT.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.775, which suggesting that the stock is 22.54% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 3.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 259.58%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are larger than NFT quarterly revenues of --. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than NFT's net income of --. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4,982.35x while NFT's PE ratio is 0.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.09x versus 15.40x for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of 2.64%. SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $8.99 which suggests that it could grow by 0.18%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than SJM Holdings.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.775, which suggesting that the stock is 22.54% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 0.825, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.541%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out 0.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $32.5M. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4,982.35x while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is 63.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.09x versus 0.81x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Studio City International Holdings has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of -18.15%. SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03% beat Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29%.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Studio City International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 124.03%. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than SJM Holdings.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.775, which suggesting that the stock is 22.54% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.125, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.504%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Studio City International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Studio City International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are larger than Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues of $152.9M. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4,982.35x while Studio City International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.09x versus 1.48x for Studio City International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of --. SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03% beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SJM Holdings has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe SJM Holdings is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.775, which suggesting that the stock is 22.54% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are larger than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4,982.35x while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.09x versus 125.31x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.