SINGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Guardforce AI has a net margin of 8.5% compared to Singapore Airlines's net margin of --. Singapore Airlines's return on equity of 17.61% beat Guardforce AI's return on equity of -71.57%.

Singapore Airlines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardforce AI has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 219.15%. Given that Guardforce AI has higher upside potential than Singapore Airlines, analysts believe Guardforce AI is more attractive than Singapore Airlines.

Singapore Airlines has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardforce AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Airlines has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. Guardforce AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Airlines pays 51.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Guardforce AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Airlines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Airlines quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Guardforce AI quarterly revenues of --. Singapore Airlines's net income of $304.1M is higher than Guardforce AI's net income of --. Notably, Singapore Airlines's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.84x while Guardforce AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Airlines is 1.28x versus 0.43x for Guardforce AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JE Cleantech Holdings has a net margin of 8.5% compared to Singapore Airlines's net margin of --. Singapore Airlines's return on equity of 17.61% beat JE Cleantech Holdings's return on equity of 4.95%.

Singapore Airlines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JE Cleantech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Singapore Airlines has higher upside potential than JE Cleantech Holdings, analysts believe Singapore Airlines is more attractive than JE Cleantech Holdings.

Singapore Airlines has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JE Cleantech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Airlines has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. JE Cleantech Holdings offers a yield of 8.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Singapore Airlines pays 51.43% of its earnings as a dividend. JE Cleantech Holdings pays out 2009.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Airlines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but JE Cleantech Holdings's is not.

Singapore Airlines quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than JE Cleantech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Singapore Airlines's net income of $304.1M is higher than JE Cleantech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Singapore Airlines's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.84x while JE Cleantech Holdings's PE ratio is 12.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Airlines is 1.28x versus 0.39x for JE Cleantech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Multi Ways Holdings has a net margin of 8.5% compared to Singapore Airlines's net margin of --. Singapore Airlines's return on equity of 17.61% beat Multi Ways Holdings's return on equity of --.

Singapore Airlines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Multi Ways Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Singapore Airlines has higher upside potential than Multi Ways Holdings, analysts believe Singapore Airlines is more attractive than Multi Ways Holdings.

Singapore Airlines has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Multi Ways Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Singapore Airlines has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. Multi Ways Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singapore Airlines pays 51.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Multi Ways Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singapore Airlines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singapore Airlines quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Multi Ways Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Singapore Airlines's net income of $304.1M is higher than Multi Ways Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Singapore Airlines's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.84x while Multi Ways Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singapore Airlines is 1.28x versus -- for Multi Ways Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.