Is Bloom Energy Flying Under the Radar?
Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) manufactures scalable fuel cells for providing on-site…
Buy
66
HKXCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$53.30
Seasonality move
:
1.39%
Day range:
$53.30 - $53.30
52-week range:
$27.07 - $56.07
Dividend yield:
2.23%
P/E ratio:
41.19x
P/S ratio:
30.47x
P/B ratio:
10.09x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
13.8K
1-year change:
74.65%
Market cap:
$67.4B
Revenue:
$2.2B
EPS (TTM):
$1.29
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$498.7M | $1.99 | 24.73% | 47.13% | $151.73 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing
|
$53.30 | -- | $67.4B | 41.19x | $0.63 | 2.23% | 30.47x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$160.57 | $151.73 | $22.4B | 26.77x | $2.00 | 0% | 11.19x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$3.32 | -- | $127.4M | 11.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.58x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$1.51 | -- | $6.1M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 4.67x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.22 | -- | $45.1M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.11x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
$0.80 | -- | $90M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.12x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing
|
0.86% | 1.170 | 0.1% | 0.91x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
26.33% | 1.603 | 9.77% | 0.58x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | 0.081 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | 2.375 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.772 | -- | 3.64x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
18.45% | 4.218 | 6.4% | 2.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing
|
$542.2M | $457.9M | 24.64% | 24.74% | 89.23% | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$507.1M | $345.1M | 19.05% | 23.51% | 57.2% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -3.38% | -- | -- |
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of 74.18% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net margin of 45.7%. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's return on equity of 24.74% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 23.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing76.77% $0.41 $6.8B FUTUFutu Holdings84.05% $1.96 $5.3B -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or FUTU?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $151.73 which suggests that it could fall by -5.51%. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings10 2 0 -
Is HKXCF or FUTU More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.600, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or FUTU?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing pays 79.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or FUTU?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing quarterly revenues are $706.4M, which are larger than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $603.4M. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net income of $524M is higher than Futu Holdings's net income of $275.7M. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.19x while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 26.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing is 30.47x versus 11.19x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing30.47x 41.19x $706.4M $524M FUTUFutu Holdings11.19x 26.77x $603.4M $275.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of 74.18% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's return on equity of 24.74% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing76.77% $0.41 $6.8B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or MATH?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or MATH More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.005, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 200.522%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or MATH?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing pays 79.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or MATH?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing quarterly revenues are $706.4M, which are larger than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net income of $524M is higher than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.19x while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing is 30.47x versus 3.58x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing30.47x 41.19x $706.4M $524M MATHMetalpha Technology Holding3.58x 11.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of 74.18% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's return on equity of 24.74% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing76.77% $0.41 $6.8B MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or MEGL?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or MEGL More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or MEGL?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing pays 79.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or MEGL?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing quarterly revenues are $706.4M, which are larger than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net income of $524M is higher than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.19x while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing is 30.47x versus 4.67x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing30.47x 41.19x $706.4M $524M MEGLMagic Empire Global4.67x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of 74.18% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's return on equity of 24.74% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing76.77% $0.41 $6.8B TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or TOP?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or TOP More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or TOP?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing pays 79.82% of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or TOP?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing quarterly revenues are $706.4M, which are larger than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net income of $524M is higher than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.19x while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing is 30.47x versus 15.11x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing30.47x 41.19x $706.4M $524M TOPTOP Financial Group15.11x 61.61x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or TROO?
TROOPS has a net margin of 74.18% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's return on equity of 24.74% beat TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing76.77% $0.41 $6.8B TROOTROOPS-- -- $72.6M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or TROO?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing is more attractive than TROOPS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing0 0 0 TROOTROOPS0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or TROO More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS has a beta of 2.543, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.261%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or TROO?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. TROOPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing pays 79.82% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or TROO?
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing quarterly revenues are $706.4M, which are larger than TROOPS quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's net income of $524M is higher than TROOPS's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.19x while TROOPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing is 30.47x versus 8.12x for TROOPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing30.47x 41.19x $706.4M $524M TROOTROOPS8.12x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
61
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
55
TLN alert for Jul 19
Talen Energy [TLN] is up 24.44% over the past day.
Sell
48
CRSP alert for Jul 19
CRISPR Therapeutics AG [CRSP] is up 18.22% over the past day.
Buy
83
SOC alert for Jul 19
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
