FUJHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of --. Subaru's return on equity of 12.59% beat Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, analysts believe Subaru is more attractive than Linkage Global.

Subaru has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.847% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.64%. Linkage Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Subaru pays 23.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Subaru's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Linkage Global quarterly revenues of --. Subaru's net income of $1B is higher than Linkage Global's net income of --. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.55x while Linkage Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.40x versus 0.75x for Linkage Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of --. Subaru's return on equity of 12.59% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's return on equity of --.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 259.08%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has higher upside potential than Subaru, analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies is more attractive than Subaru.

Subaru has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.847% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.64%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Subaru pays 23.26% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Subaru's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Subaru's net income of $1B is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.55x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's PE ratio is 7.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.40x versus 0.15x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of --. Subaru's return on equity of 12.59% beat Tokyo Lifestyle's return on equity of -1.49%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle, analysts believe Subaru is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle.

Subaru has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.847% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.64%. Tokyo Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Subaru pays 23.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Subaru's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle quarterly revenues of --. Subaru's net income of $1B is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle's net income of --. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.55x while Tokyo Lifestyle's PE ratio is 2.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.40x versus 0.08x for Tokyo Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of 5.38%. Subaru's return on equity of 12.59% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 13.1%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of $225.07 which suggests that it could grow by 33.46%. Given that Toyota Motor has higher upside potential than Subaru, analysts believe Toyota Motor is more attractive than Subaru.

Subaru has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.847% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.319%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.64%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.46 per share. Subaru pays 23.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 23.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Subaru's net income of $1B is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $4.4B. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.55x while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 7.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.40x versus 0.71x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.