How High Will Brown Forman Stock Go?
On the surface, Brown‑Forman (NYSE: BF.B) is having an unremarkable year.…
Buy
54
EMSHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$771.51
Seasonality move
:
-0.94%
Day range:
$771.51 - $771.51
52-week range:
$619.19 - $854.85
Dividend yield:
1.91%
P/E ratio:
34.94x
P/S ratio:
7.66x
P/B ratio:
8.89x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-9.75%
Market cap:
$18B
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
$22.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$1.2B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GLNCY
Glencore PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
$771.51 | -- | $18B | 34.94x | $18.49 | 1.91% | 7.66x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$10.90 | -- | $3.6B | 13.24x | $0.51 | 4.7% | 0.77x |
|
GLNCY
Glencore PLC
|
$8.12 | -- | $48.4B | 17.00x | $0.10 | 2.83% | 0.22x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
$94.23 | -- | $43.5B | 37.04x | $1.58 | 1.68% | 5.25x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
$26.32 | -- | $72.5B | 20.82x | $0.75 | 2.84% | 2.49x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
$25.15 | -- | $40.4B | 31.16x | $0.41 | 1.62% | 3.06x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -0.035 | -- | 2.39x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
42.02% | -0.556 | 47.74% | 1.01x |
|
GLNCY
Glencore PLC
|
47.14% | 1.549 | 75.46% | 0.35x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
48.6% | 0.048 | 11.92% | 0.88x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
32.18% | 0.592 | 26.71% | 0.90x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
42.98% | 0.787 | 15.49% | 1.23x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 23.16% | 23.25% | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
-- | -- | 6.19% | 10.24% | -- | -- |
|
GLNCY
Glencore PLC
|
-- | -- | -2.38% | -4.47% | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | 12.12% | 25.06% | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | 8.04% | 10.63% | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | 10.24% | 19.07% | -- | -- |
Ems-Chemie Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or CLZNY?
Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B CLZNYClariant AG-- -- $4.6B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Clariant AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 CLZNYClariant AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or CLZNY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.685, which suggesting that the stock is 31.522% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.717, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.315%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.94x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 13.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.66x versus 0.77x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.66x 34.94x -- -- CLZNYClariant AG0.77x 13.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or GLNCY?
Glencore PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Glencore PLC's return on equity of -4.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B GLNCYGlencore PLC-- -- $71.9B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or GLNCY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Glencore PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Glencore PLC, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Glencore PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 GLNCYGlencore PLC0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or GLNCY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.685, which suggesting that the stock is 31.522% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Glencore PLC has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.905%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or GLNCY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Glencore PLC offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Glencore PLC pays out -96.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or GLNCY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Glencore PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Glencore PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.94x while Glencore PLC's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.66x versus 0.22x for Glencore PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.66x 34.94x -- -- GLNCYGlencore PLC0.22x 17.00x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or GVDNY?
Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 25.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B GVDNYGivaudan SA-- -- $9.9B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 GVDNYGivaudan SA0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or GVDNY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.685, which suggesting that the stock is 31.522% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.256%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 57.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.94x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 37.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.66x versus 5.25x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.66x 34.94x -- -- GVDNYGivaudan SA5.25x 37.04x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or HCMLY?
Holcim has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Holcim's return on equity of 10.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B HCMLYHolcim-- -- $45.2B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Holcim, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Holcim.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 HCMLYHolcim0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or HCMLY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.685, which suggesting that the stock is 31.522% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim has a beta of 1.088, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.818%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Holcim offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim pays out 53.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.94x while Holcim's PE ratio is 20.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.66x versus 2.49x for Holcim. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.66x 34.94x -- -- HCMLYHolcim2.49x 20.82x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or SXYAY?
Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 19.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B SXYAYSika AG-- -- $13.7B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Sika AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 SXYAYSika AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or SXYAY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.685, which suggesting that the stock is 31.522% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.155%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 21.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.94x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 31.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.66x versus 3.06x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.66x 34.94x -- -- SXYAYSika AG3.06x 31.16x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Bloom Energy Flying Under the Radar?
Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) manufactures scalable fuel cells for providing on-site…
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
61
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
55
TLN alert for Jul 19
Talen Energy [TLN] is up 24.44% over the past day.
Sell
48
CRSP alert for Jul 19
CRISPR Therapeutics AG [CRSP] is up 18.22% over the past day.
Buy
83
SOC alert for Jul 19
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
