DTZZF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of -- compared to Dotz Nano's net margin of -3.72%. Dotz Nano's return on equity of -- beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 5.71%.

Dotz Nano has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.75%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than Dotz Nano, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than Dotz Nano.

Dotz Nano has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.469%.

Dotz Nano has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Dotz Nano pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dotz Nano quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Dotz Nano's net income of -- is lower than Flexible Solutions International's net income of -$277.7K. Notably, Dotz Nano's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 30.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dotz Nano is 89.87x versus 1.89x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICL Group has a net margin of -- compared to Dotz Nano's net margin of 5.15%. Dotz Nano's return on equity of -- beat ICL Group's return on equity of 6.43%.

Dotz Nano has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ICL Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.74 which suggests that it could fall by -1.93%. Given that ICL Group has higher upside potential than Dotz Nano, analysts believe ICL Group is more attractive than Dotz Nano.

Dotz Nano has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICL Group has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.632%.

Dotz Nano has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICL Group offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Dotz Nano pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICL Group pays out 61.67% of its earnings as a dividend. ICL Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dotz Nano quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ICL Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Dotz Nano's net income of -- is lower than ICL Group's net income of $91M. Notably, Dotz Nano's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ICL Group's PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dotz Nano is 89.87x versus 1.29x for ICL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Israel has a net margin of -- compared to Dotz Nano's net margin of 1.98%. Dotz Nano's return on equity of -- beat The Israel's return on equity of 2.54%.

Dotz Nano has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Israel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dotz Nano has higher upside potential than The Israel, analysts believe Dotz Nano is more attractive than The Israel.

Dotz Nano has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Israel has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Dotz Nano has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Israel offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Dotz Nano pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Israel pays out 19.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The Israel's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dotz Nano quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Israel quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Dotz Nano's net income of -- is lower than The Israel's net income of $35M. Notably, Dotz Nano's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Israel's PE ratio is 12.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dotz Nano is 89.87x versus 0.30x for The Israel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

N2OFF has a net margin of -- compared to Dotz Nano's net margin of -1807.58%. Dotz Nano's return on equity of -- beat N2OFF's return on equity of -111.62%.

Dotz Nano has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand N2OFF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15141.49%. Given that N2OFF has higher upside potential than Dotz Nano, analysts believe N2OFF is more attractive than Dotz Nano.

Dotz Nano has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison N2OFF has a beta of 1.768, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.795%.

Dotz Nano has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. N2OFF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dotz Nano pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. N2OFF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dotz Nano quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than N2OFF quarterly revenues of $66K. Dotz Nano's net income of -- is lower than N2OFF's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Dotz Nano's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while N2OFF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dotz Nano is 89.87x versus 11.85x for N2OFF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.