DSHK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HWH International has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Drive Shack's net margin of -191.44%. Drive Shack's return on equity of -- beat HWH International's return on equity of --.

Drive Shack has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1906.02%. On the other hand HWH International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Drive Shack has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Drive Shack is more attractive than HWH International.

Drive Shack has a beta of 2.137, which suggesting that the stock is 113.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Drive Shack has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HWH International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Drive Shack pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Drive Shack quarterly revenues are $74.6M, which are larger than HWH International quarterly revenues of $295.2K. Drive Shack's net income of -$3.6M is lower than HWH International's net income of -$565.1K. Notably, Drive Shack's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HWH International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Drive Shack is 0.04x versus 4.84x for HWH International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kenilworth Systems has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Drive Shack's net margin of -1628.26%. Drive Shack's return on equity of -- beat Kenilworth Systems's return on equity of --.

Drive Shack has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1906.02%. On the other hand Kenilworth Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Drive Shack has higher upside potential than Kenilworth Systems, analysts believe Drive Shack is more attractive than Kenilworth Systems.

Drive Shack has a beta of 2.137, which suggesting that the stock is 113.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenilworth Systems has a beta of 2.686, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.578%.

Drive Shack has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kenilworth Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Drive Shack pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kenilworth Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Drive Shack quarterly revenues are $74.6M, which are larger than Kenilworth Systems quarterly revenues of $5K. Drive Shack's net income of -$3.6M is lower than Kenilworth Systems's net income of -$45.8K. Notably, Drive Shack's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kenilworth Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Drive Shack is 0.04x versus -- for Kenilworth Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Drive Shack's net margin of 15.13%. Drive Shack's return on equity of -- beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.

Drive Shack has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1906.02%. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $115.90 which suggests that it could grow by 3.04%. Given that Drive Shack has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, analysts believe Drive Shack is more attractive than Planet Fitness.

Drive Shack has a beta of 2.137, which suggesting that the stock is 113.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.169%.

Drive Shack has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Drive Shack pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Drive Shack quarterly revenues are $74.6M, which are smaller than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $276.7M. Drive Shack's net income of -$3.6M is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M. Notably, Drive Shack's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 53.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Drive Shack is 0.04x versus 7.91x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victory Marine Holdings has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Drive Shack's net margin of --. Drive Shack's return on equity of -- beat Victory Marine Holdings's return on equity of --.

Drive Shack has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1906.02%. On the other hand Victory Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Drive Shack has higher upside potential than Victory Marine Holdings, analysts believe Drive Shack is more attractive than Victory Marine Holdings.

Drive Shack has a beta of 2.137, which suggesting that the stock is 113.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victory Marine Holdings has a beta of 8.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 742.749%.

Drive Shack has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victory Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Drive Shack pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victory Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Drive Shack quarterly revenues are $74.6M, which are larger than Victory Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Drive Shack's net income of -$3.6M is higher than Victory Marine Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Drive Shack's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victory Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Drive Shack is 0.04x versus -- for Victory Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.