ASPU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of -- compared to Aspen Group's net margin of 13.05%. Aspen Group's return on equity of -- beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 16.71%.

Aspen Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2400%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $143.25 which suggests that it could grow by 22.35%. Given that Aspen Group has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Aspen Group is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Aspen Group has a beta of -0.350, which suggesting that the stock is 134.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.008%.

Aspen Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspen Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspen Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $466.1M. Aspen Group's net income of -- is lower than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $60.8M. Notably, Aspen Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 19.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Group is 0.02x versus 2.59x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of -- compared to Aspen Group's net margin of 24.76%. Aspen Group's return on equity of -- beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87%.

Aspen Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2400%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $213.33 which suggests that it could grow by 24.16%. Given that Aspen Group has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Aspen Group is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Aspen Group has a beta of -0.350, which suggesting that the stock is 134.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.608%.

Aspen Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspen Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspen Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $289.3M. Aspen Group's net income of -- is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M. Notably, Aspen Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Group is 0.02x versus 4.75x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of -- compared to Aspen Group's net margin of 20.51%. Aspen Group's return on equity of -- beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Aspen Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2400%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.91%. Given that Aspen Group has higher upside potential than Perdoceo Education, analysts believe Aspen Group is more attractive than Perdoceo Education.

Aspen Group has a beta of -0.350, which suggesting that the stock is 134.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.827, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.343%.

Aspen Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Aspen Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aspen Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $213M. Aspen Group's net income of -- is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M. Notably, Aspen Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 13.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Group is 0.02x versus 2.75x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of -- compared to Aspen Group's net margin of 9.8%. Aspen Group's return on equity of -- beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76%.

Aspen Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2400%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $102.67 which suggests that it could grow by 29.29%. Given that Aspen Group has higher upside potential than Strategic Education, analysts believe Aspen Group is more attractive than Strategic Education.

Aspen Group has a beta of -0.350, which suggesting that the stock is 134.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.524, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.624%.

Aspen Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Aspen Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aspen Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $303.6M. Aspen Group's net income of -- is lower than Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Aspen Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 16.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Group is 0.02x versus 1.55x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.