Is Bloom Energy Flying Under the Radar?
Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) manufactures scalable fuel cells for providing on-site…
Buy
85
ALMMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.74
Seasonality move
:
-7.53%
Day range:
$0.72 - $0.74
52-week range:
$0.50 - $0.84
Dividend yield:
4.11%
P/E ratio:
6.63x
P/S ratio:
0.37x
P/B ratio:
1.25x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
16.7K
1-year change:
22.21%
Market cap:
$12.6B
Revenue:
$33B
EPS (TTM):
$0.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALMMF
Aluminum Corp of China
|
$8.4B | -- | -7.12% | -- | -- |
|
GURE
Gulf Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZKIN
ZK International Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALMMF
Aluminum Corp of China
|
$0.74 | -- | $12.6B | 6.63x | $0.02 | 4.11% | 0.37x |
|
GURE
Gulf Resources
|
$0.69 | -- | $9.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.95x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
$0.20 | -- | $3.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
|
$2.50 | -- | $19.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.58x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech
|
$0.83 | -- | $6.3M | 4.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.45x |
|
ZKIN
ZK International Group
|
$2.78 | -- | $14.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.09x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALMMF
Aluminum Corp of China
|
43.24% | 1.651 | 45.13% | 0.80x |
|
GURE
Gulf Resources
|
-- | 0.419 | -- | 0.71x |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
5.98% | -4.380 | 352.64% | 0.93x |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
|
39.92% | 1.341 | 76.14% | 0.14x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech
|
-226.02% | 1.163 | 30.76% | 0.12x |
|
ZKIN
ZK International Group
|
47.74% | 5.877 | 133.61% | 0.83x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALMMF
Aluminum Corp of China
|
$1.2B | $933M | 8.12% | 12.4% | 12.82% | $4B |
|
GURE
Gulf Resources
|
$10.2K | -$1.4M | -36.3% | -36.3% | -287.19% | -$1.6M |
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
$84.1K | -$3.4M | -5.62% | -5.99% | -30.93% | -$2.5M |
|
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
|
-- | -- | -32.57% | -85.96% | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZKIN
ZK International Group
|
-- | -- | -87.77% | -131.08% | -- | -- |
Aluminum Corp of China vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or GURE?
Gulf Resources has a net margin of 6.34% compared to Aluminum Corp of China's net margin of -288.54%. Aluminum Corp of China's return on equity of 12.4% beat Gulf Resources's return on equity of -36.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp of China15.86% $0.03 $23.9B GUREGulf Resources0.63% -$0.40 $142.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or GURE?
Aluminum Corp of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gulf Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1998.71%. Given that Gulf Resources has higher upside potential than Aluminum Corp of China, analysts believe Gulf Resources is more attractive than Aluminum Corp of China.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0 0 0 GUREGulf Resources0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or GURE More Risky?
Aluminum Corp of China has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.219%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or GURE?
Aluminum Corp of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Gulf Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp of China pays 38.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Gulf Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or GURE?
Aluminum Corp of China quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are larger than Gulf Resources quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Aluminum Corp of China's net income of $486.3M is higher than Gulf Resources's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, Aluminum Corp of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.63x while Gulf Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp of China is 0.37x versus 0.95x for Gulf Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0.37x 6.63x $7.7B $486.3M GUREGulf Resources0.95x -- $1.6M -$4.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or ITP?
IT Tech Packaging has a net margin of 6.34% compared to Aluminum Corp of China's net margin of -32.15%. Aluminum Corp of China's return on equity of 12.4% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp of China15.86% $0.03 $23.9B ITPIT Tech Packaging0.77% -$0.35 $162.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or ITP?
Aluminum Corp of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp of China has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe Aluminum Corp of China is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0 0 0 ITPIT Tech Packaging0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or ITP More Risky?
Aluminum Corp of China has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -1.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 200.198%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or ITP?
Aluminum Corp of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. IT Tech Packaging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp of China pays 38.04% of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or ITP?
Aluminum Corp of China quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are larger than IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues of $10.9M. Aluminum Corp of China's net income of $486.3M is higher than IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Aluminum Corp of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.63x while IT Tech Packaging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp of China is 0.37x versus 0.03x for IT Tech Packaging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0.37x 6.63x $7.7B $486.3M ITPIT Tech Packaging0.03x -- $10.9M -$3.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or RETO?
ReTo Eco-Solutions has a net margin of 6.34% compared to Aluminum Corp of China's net margin of --. Aluminum Corp of China's return on equity of 12.4% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions's return on equity of -85.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp of China15.86% $0.03 $23.9B RETOReTo Eco-Solutions-- -- $22.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or RETO?
Aluminum Corp of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp of China has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, analysts believe Aluminum Corp of China is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0 0 0 RETOReTo Eco-Solutions0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or RETO More Risky?
Aluminum Corp of China has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.115%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or RETO?
Aluminum Corp of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. ReTo Eco-Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp of China pays 38.04% of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or RETO?
Aluminum Corp of China quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are larger than ReTo Eco-Solutions quarterly revenues of --. Aluminum Corp of China's net income of $486.3M is higher than ReTo Eco-Solutions's net income of --. Notably, Aluminum Corp of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.63x while ReTo Eco-Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp of China is 0.37x versus 1.58x for ReTo Eco-Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0.37x 6.63x $7.7B $486.3M RETOReTo Eco-Solutions1.58x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or SEED?
Origin Agritech has a net margin of 6.34% compared to Aluminum Corp of China's net margin of --. Aluminum Corp of China's return on equity of 12.4% beat Origin Agritech's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp of China15.86% $0.03 $23.9B SEEDOrigin Agritech-- -- -$5.7M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or SEED?
Aluminum Corp of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Origin Agritech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp of China has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech, analysts believe Aluminum Corp of China is more attractive than Origin Agritech.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0 0 0 SEEDOrigin Agritech0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or SEED More Risky?
Aluminum Corp of China has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech has a beta of 1.740, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.967%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or SEED?
Aluminum Corp of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Origin Agritech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp of China pays 38.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or SEED?
Aluminum Corp of China quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are larger than Origin Agritech quarterly revenues of --. Aluminum Corp of China's net income of $486.3M is higher than Origin Agritech's net income of --. Notably, Aluminum Corp of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.63x while Origin Agritech's PE ratio is 4.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp of China is 0.37x versus 0.45x for Origin Agritech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0.37x 6.63x $7.7B $486.3M SEEDOrigin Agritech0.45x 4.43x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALMMF or ZKIN?
ZK International Group has a net margin of 6.34% compared to Aluminum Corp of China's net margin of --. Aluminum Corp of China's return on equity of 12.4% beat ZK International Group's return on equity of -131.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALMMFAluminum Corp of China15.86% $0.03 $23.9B ZKINZK International Group-- -- $54.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ALMMF or ZKIN?
Aluminum Corp of China has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ZK International Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aluminum Corp of China has higher upside potential than ZK International Group, analysts believe Aluminum Corp of China is more attractive than ZK International Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0 0 0 ZKINZK International Group0 0 0 -
Is ALMMF or ZKIN More Risky?
Aluminum Corp of China has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZK International Group has a beta of 2.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.647%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALMMF or ZKIN?
Aluminum Corp of China has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. ZK International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aluminum Corp of China pays 38.04% of its earnings as a dividend. ZK International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aluminum Corp of China's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALMMF or ZKIN?
Aluminum Corp of China quarterly revenues are $7.7B, which are larger than ZK International Group quarterly revenues of --. Aluminum Corp of China's net income of $486.3M is higher than ZK International Group's net income of --. Notably, Aluminum Corp of China's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.63x while ZK International Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aluminum Corp of China is 0.37x versus 0.09x for ZK International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALMMFAluminum Corp of China0.37x 6.63x $7.7B $486.3M ZKINZK International Group0.09x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
61
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
55
TLN alert for Jul 19
Talen Energy [TLN] is up 24.44% over the past day.
Sell
48
CRSP alert for Jul 19
CRISPR Therapeutics AG [CRSP] is up 18.22% over the past day.
Buy
83
SOC alert for Jul 19
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
