Why Is Archer Aviation Stock Going Up?
Archer Aviation (NYSE:ACHR) is an aviation startup that is working…
Buy
70
TINT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$31.38
Seasonality move
:
-8.7%
Day range:
$30.95 - $30.95
52-week range:
$23.98 - $34.63
Dividend yield:
1.6%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
58
1-year change:
-8.82%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
$30.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 1.6% | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
$46.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
$31.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 1.63% | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
$43.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
$38.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 4.8% | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
$45.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.06% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.115 | -- | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
-- | 1.824 | -- | -- |
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
-- | 0.849 | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | 1.422 | -- | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
-- | 1.105 | -- | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | 1.590 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or DAT?
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- DATProShares Big Data Refiners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or DAT?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 DATProShares Big Data Refiners ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or DAT More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or DAT?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or DAT?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- DATProShares Big Data Refiners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or ION?
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or ION?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or ION More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or ION?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or ION?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- IONProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or OND?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or OND?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares On-Demand ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares On-Demand ETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than ProShares On-Demand ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or OND More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or OND?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. ProShares On-Demand ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or OND?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares On-Demand ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares On-Demand ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or SUPL?
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- SUPLProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or SUPL?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 SUPLProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or SUPL More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or SUPL?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF offers a yield of 4.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or SUPL?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- SUPLProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINT or TINY?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINT or TINY?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Smart Materials ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF, analysts believe ProShares Smart Materials ETF is more attractive than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF0 0 0 TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINT or TINY More Risky?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINT or TINY?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ProShares Smart Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINT or TINY?
ProShares Smart Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Smart Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Smart Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Smart Materials ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINTProShares Smart Materials ETF-- -- -- -- TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
How High Will Brown Forman Stock Go?
On the surface, Brown‑Forman (NYSE: BF.B) is having an unremarkable year.…
Is Bloom Energy Flying Under the Radar?
Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) manufactures scalable fuel cells for providing on-site…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
61
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
55
TLN alert for Jul 19
Talen Energy [TLN] is up 24.44% over the past day.
Sell
48
CRSP alert for Jul 19
CRISPR Therapeutics AG [CRSP] is up 18.22% over the past day.
Buy
83
SOC alert for Jul 19
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
