MUSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to American Century Multisector Income ETF's net margin of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Century Multisector Income ETF has higher upside potential than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF, analysts believe American Century Multisector Income ETF is more attractive than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.71%.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.12%. Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, American Century Multisector Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Century Multisector Income ETF is -- versus -- for Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Janus Henderson Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to American Century Multisector Income ETF's net margin of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Janus Henderson Income ETF's return on equity of --.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Janus Henderson Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Century Multisector Income ETF has higher upside potential than Janus Henderson Income ETF, analysts believe American Century Multisector Income ETF is more attractive than Janus Henderson Income ETF.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Janus Henderson Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.12%. Janus Henderson Income ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Janus Henderson Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Janus Henderson Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Janus Henderson Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, American Century Multisector Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Janus Henderson Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Century Multisector Income ETF is -- versus -- for Janus Henderson Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to American Century Multisector Income ETF's net margin of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's return on equity of --.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Century Multisector Income ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF, analysts believe American Century Multisector Income ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.12%. PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF offers a yield of 5.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, American Century Multisector Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Century Multisector Income ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.