TPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of 61.56% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 11.1%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.23% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 20.2%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $921.93, signalling downside risk potential of -7.54%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $44.11 which suggests that it could grow by 34.27%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.867%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $120.7M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $494M. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.88x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 7.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 31.54x versus 1.25x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 61.56% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 25.04%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.23% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 20.78%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $921.93, signalling downside risk potential of -7.54%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $140.16 which suggests that it could grow by 19.1%. Given that EOG Resources has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe EOG Resources is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.747%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $120.7M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.88x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 10.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 31.54x versus 2.83x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a net margin of 61.56% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 91.49%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.23% beat North European Oil Royalty Trust's return on equity of 421.7%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $921.93, signalling downside risk potential of -7.54%. On the other hand North European Oil Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Texas Pacific Land has higher upside potential than North European Oil Royalty Trust, analysts believe Texas Pacific Land is more attractive than North European Oil Royalty Trust.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison North European Oil Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.054, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.636%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. North European Oil Royalty Trust offers a yield of 9.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. North European Oil Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Pacific Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $196M, which are larger than North European Oil Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $120.7M is higher than North European Oil Royalty Trust's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.88x while North European Oil Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 8.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 31.54x versus 7.35x for North European Oil Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 61.56% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 9.52%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.23% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of $921.93, signalling downside risk potential of -7.54%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.49 which suggests that it could grow by 15.52%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.08%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $120.7M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.88x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 31.54x versus 1.39x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.