PKG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 9.52% compared to Packaging Corp of America's net margin of 6.69%. Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 20.21% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 17.91%.

Packaging Corp of America has a consensus price target of $200.85, signalling upside risk potential of 0.52%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $118.22 which suggests that it could grow by 11.29%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.826, which suggesting that the stock is 17.432% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.654%.

Packaging Corp of America has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Packaging Corp of America pays 55.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Packaging Corp of America's net income of $203.8M is higher than Crown Holdings's net income of $193M. Notably, Packaging Corp of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.90x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 22.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Packaging Corp of America is 2.09x versus 1.06x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greif has a net margin of 9.52% compared to Packaging Corp of America's net margin of 3.41%. Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 20.21% beat Greif's return on equity of 9.55%.

Packaging Corp of America has a consensus price target of $200.85, signalling upside risk potential of 0.52%. On the other hand Greif has an analysts' consensus of $76.40 which suggests that it could grow by 16.06%. Given that Greif has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe Greif is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.826, which suggesting that the stock is 17.432% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greif has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.237%.

Packaging Corp of America has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Greif offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Packaging Corp of America pays 55.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Greif pays out 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Greif quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Packaging Corp of America's net income of $203.8M is higher than Greif's net income of $47.3M. Notably, Packaging Corp of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.90x while Greif's PE ratio is 18.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Packaging Corp of America is 2.09x versus 0.69x for Greif. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hasbro has a net margin of 9.52% compared to Packaging Corp of America's net margin of 11.12%. Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 20.21% beat Hasbro's return on equity of 36.13%.

Packaging Corp of America has a consensus price target of $200.85, signalling upside risk potential of 0.52%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $80.96 which suggests that it could grow by 4.05%. Given that Hasbro has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe Hasbro is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.826, which suggesting that the stock is 17.432% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.588, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.246%.

Packaging Corp of America has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Hasbro offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Packaging Corp of America pays 55.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corp of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hasbro's is not.

Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $887.1M. Packaging Corp of America's net income of $203.8M is higher than Hasbro's net income of $98.6M. Notably, Packaging Corp of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.90x while Hasbro's PE ratio is 25.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Packaging Corp of America is 2.09x versus 2.57x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Paper has a net margin of 9.52% compared to Packaging Corp of America's net margin of -1.78%. Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 20.21% beat International Paper's return on equity of 3.83%.

Packaging Corp of America has a consensus price target of $200.85, signalling upside risk potential of 0.52%. On the other hand International Paper has an analysts' consensus of $54.76 which suggests that it could grow by 8.76%. Given that International Paper has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe International Paper is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.826, which suggesting that the stock is 17.432% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Paper has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.078%.

Packaging Corp of America has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. International Paper offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Packaging Corp of America pays 55.75% of its earnings as a dividend. International Paper pays out 115.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corp of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Paper's is not.

Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than International Paper quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Packaging Corp of America's net income of $203.8M is higher than International Paper's net income of -$105M. Notably, Packaging Corp of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.90x while International Paper's PE ratio is 43.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Packaging Corp of America is 2.09x versus 0.95x for International Paper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.