PAAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 21.82% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of -39.77%. Pan American Silver's return on equity of 6.62% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.59%.

Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of $35.09, signalling upside risk potential of 24.91%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.33 which suggests that it could grow by 40.65%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Pan American Silver, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Pan American Silver.

Pan American Silver has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pan American Silver has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Pan American Silver pays 130.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pan American Silver quarterly revenues are $773.2M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Pan American Silver's net income of $168.7M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Pan American Silver's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.29x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan American Silver is 3.41x versus 38.00x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen has a net margin of 21.82% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of -17.57%. Pan American Silver's return on equity of 6.62% beat McEwen's return on equity of -6.05%.

Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of $35.09, signalling upside risk potential of 24.91%. On the other hand McEwen has an analysts' consensus of $15.06 which suggests that it could grow by 37.56%. Given that McEwen has higher upside potential than Pan American Silver, analysts believe McEwen is more attractive than Pan American Silver.

Pan American Silver has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.544%.

Pan American Silver has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. McEwen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pan American Silver pays 130.4% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pan American Silver quarterly revenues are $773.2M, which are larger than McEwen quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Pan American Silver's net income of $168.7M is higher than McEwen's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Pan American Silver's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.29x while McEwen's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan American Silver is 3.41x versus 3.37x for McEwen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rise Gold has a net margin of 21.82% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of --. Pan American Silver's return on equity of 6.62% beat Rise Gold's return on equity of --.

Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of $35.09, signalling upside risk potential of 24.91%. On the other hand Rise Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan American Silver has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe Pan American Silver is more attractive than Rise Gold.

Pan American Silver has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rise Gold has a beta of -1.278, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 227.842%.

Pan American Silver has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Rise Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pan American Silver pays 130.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Rise Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pan American Silver quarterly revenues are $773.2M, which are larger than Rise Gold quarterly revenues of --. Pan American Silver's net income of $168.7M is higher than Rise Gold's net income of -$756K. Notably, Pan American Silver's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.29x while Rise Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan American Silver is 3.41x versus -- for Rise Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 21.82% compared to Pan American Silver's net margin of --. Pan American Silver's return on equity of 6.62% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Pan American Silver has a consensus price target of $35.09, signalling upside risk potential of 24.91%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $41.58 which suggests that it could grow by 164.7%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Pan American Silver, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Pan American Silver.

Pan American Silver has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.275%.

Pan American Silver has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pan American Silver pays 130.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pan American Silver quarterly revenues are $773.2M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Pan American Silver's net income of $168.7M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of $7.3M. Notably, Pan American Silver's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.29x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan American Silver is 3.41x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.