MSIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of -- compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 88.82%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 9.79%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of $17.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.77%. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic BDC has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.77%. Given that MSC Income Fund has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic BDC, analysts believe MSC Income Fund is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.74%. Chicago Atlantic BDC offers a yield of 12.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 70.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 129.07% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic BDC's is not.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues of $8.6M. MSC Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of $7.6M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.92x while Chicago Atlantic BDC's PE ratio is 12.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 10.36x versus 6.41x for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Main Street Capital has a net margin of -- compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 83.2%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Main Street Capital's return on equity of 19.26%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of $17.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.77%. On the other hand Main Street Capital has an analysts' consensus of $56.25 which suggests that it could fall by -12.66%. Given that MSC Income Fund has higher upside potential than Main Street Capital, analysts believe MSC Income Fund is more attractive than Main Street Capital.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Main Street Capital has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.039%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.74%. Main Street Capital offers a yield of 4.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 70.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Main Street Capital pays out 63.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Main Street Capital quarterly revenues of $139.5M. MSC Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Main Street Capital's net income of $116.1M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.92x while Main Street Capital's PE ratio is 10.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 10.36x versus 9.29x for Main Street Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust has a net margin of -- compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 20.21%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 17.48%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of $17.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.77%. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $117.79 which suggests that it could fall by -7.93%. Given that MSC Income Fund has higher upside potential than Northern Trust, analysts believe MSC Income Fund is more attractive than Northern Trust.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.035%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.74%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 70.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out 31.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $1.9B. MSC Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $392M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.92x while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 11.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 10.36x versus 2.98x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree has a net margin of -- compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of -5.16%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat LendingTree's return on equity of -47.16%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of $17.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.77%. On the other hand LendingTree has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.1%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than MSC Income Fund.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.667%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.74%. LendingTree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 70.3% of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LendingTree quarterly revenues of $239.7M. MSC Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than LendingTree's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.92x while LendingTree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 10.36x versus 0.52x for LendingTree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.