CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Celestica's net margin of 2.37%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.47% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 19.84%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $136.01, signalling downside risk potential of -15.06%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $44.88 which suggests that it could fall by -13.31%. Given that Celestica has more downside risk than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe Super Micro Computer is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 1.810, which suggesting that the stock is 80.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.431, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.087%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Celestica's net income of $86.2M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $108.8M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.11x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 27.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.88x versus 1.52x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siyata Mobile has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Celestica's net margin of -153.51%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.47% beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity of -469.42%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $136.01, signalling downside risk potential of -15.06%. On the other hand Siyata Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28116.11%. Given that Siyata Mobile has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Siyata Mobile is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 1.810, which suggesting that the stock is 80.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siyata Mobile has a beta of 2.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.609%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siyata Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siyata Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Siyata Mobile quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Celestica's net income of $86.2M is higher than Siyata Mobile's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.11x while Siyata Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.88x versus 0.24x for Siyata Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Celestica's net margin of -105.32%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.47% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -497.03%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $136.01, signalling downside risk potential of -15.06%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 828.22%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 1.810, which suggesting that the stock is 80.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 3.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.891%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.6M. Celestica's net income of $86.2M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.11x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.88x versus 0.41x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Celestica's net margin of 10.4%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.47% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16.06%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $136.01, signalling downside risk potential of -15.06%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $347.90 which suggests that it could grow by 4.88%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 1.810, which suggesting that the stock is 80.997% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.746, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.607%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Celestica's net income of $86.2M is lower than Zebra Technologies's net income of $136M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.11x while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 31.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.88x versus 3.37x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.