UUUU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of -155.62% compared to Energy Fuels's net margin of 0.16%. Energy Fuels's return on equity of -17.16% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 7.57%.

Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $8.63, signalling downside risk potential of -7.85%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $21.38 which suggests that it could grow by 37.73%. Given that Helmerich & Payne has higher upside potential than Energy Fuels, analysts believe Helmerich & Payne is more attractive than Energy Fuels.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.446%.

Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 6.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $16.9M, which are smaller than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $1B. Energy Fuels's net income of -$26.3M is lower than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 7.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Fuels is 24.62x versus 0.50x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of -155.62% compared to Energy Fuels's net margin of 37.21%. Energy Fuels's return on equity of -17.16% beat Centrus Energy's return on equity of 94.73%.

Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $8.63, signalling downside risk potential of -7.85%. On the other hand Centrus Energy has an analysts' consensus of $189.63 which suggests that it could fall by -23.95%. Given that Centrus Energy has more downside risk than Energy Fuels, analysts believe Energy Fuels is more attractive than Centrus Energy.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.474%.

Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Centrus Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Centrus Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $16.9M, which are smaller than Centrus Energy quarterly revenues of $73.1M. Energy Fuels's net income of -$26.3M is lower than Centrus Energy's net income of $27.2M. Notably, Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Centrus Energy's PE ratio is 39.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Fuels is 24.62x versus 8.79x for Centrus Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uranium Energy has a net margin of -155.62% compared to Energy Fuels's net margin of -20.57%. Energy Fuels's return on equity of -17.16% beat Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09%.

Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $8.63, signalling downside risk potential of -7.85%. On the other hand Uranium Energy has an analysts' consensus of $9.88 which suggests that it could grow by 22.98%. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than Energy Fuels, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than Energy Fuels.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.829%.

Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uranium Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uranium Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $16.9M, which are smaller than Uranium Energy quarterly revenues of $49.8M. Energy Fuels's net income of -$26.3M is higher than Uranium Energy's net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Uranium Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Fuels is 24.62x versus 47.17x for Uranium Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viper Energy has a net margin of -155.62% compared to Energy Fuels's net margin of 30.61%. Energy Fuels's return on equity of -17.16% beat Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68%.

Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $8.63, signalling downside risk potential of -7.85%. On the other hand Viper Energy has an analysts' consensus of $55.14 which suggests that it could grow by 42.45%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Energy Fuels, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Energy Fuels.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viper Energy has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.713%.

Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viper Energy offers a yield of 6.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy pays out 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $16.9M, which are smaller than Viper Energy quarterly revenues of $245M. Energy Fuels's net income of -$26.3M is lower than Viper Energy's net income of $75M. Notably, Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Viper Energy's PE ratio is 10.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Fuels is 24.62x versus 4.40x for Viper Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.