ULH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Landstar System has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 2.59%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39% beat Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.31%. On the other hand Landstar System has an analysts' consensus of $141.48 which suggests that it could grow by 3.82%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Landstar System.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.67200000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.855%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Landstar System offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System pays out 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $382.4M, which are smaller than Landstar System quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Landstar System's net income of $29.8M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Landstar System's PE ratio is 26.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.38x versus 1.00x for Landstar System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marten Transport has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 3.13%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39% beat Marten Transport's return on equity of 2.72%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.31%. On the other hand Marten Transport has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.65%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Universal Logistics Holdings, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Universal Logistics Holdings.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.67200000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.403%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Marten Transport offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport pays out 72.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $382.4M, which are larger than Marten Transport quarterly revenues of $229.9M. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Marten Transport's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Marten Transport's PE ratio is 49.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.38x versus 1.13x for Marten Transport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 18.52%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 27.13%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.31%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line has an analysts' consensus of $168.35 which suggests that it could grow by 3.86%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Old Dominion Freight Line, analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Old Dominion Freight Line.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.67200000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.368%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Old Dominion Freight Line offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 18.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $382.4M, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line's net income of $254.7M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Old Dominion Freight Line's PE ratio is 30.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.38x versus 6.09x for Old Dominion Freight Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saia has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 6.33%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39% beat Saia's return on equity of 14.51%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.31%. On the other hand Saia has an analysts' consensus of $298.15 which suggests that it could grow by 3.49%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Saia, analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Saia.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.67200000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saia has a beta of 1.980, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.966%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Saia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Saia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $382.4M, which are smaller than Saia quarterly revenues of $787.6M. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Saia's net income of $49.8M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Saia's PE ratio is 24.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.38x versus 2.38x for Saia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.