TER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 16.57%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 54.9%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $96.10, signalling upside risk potential of 2.33%. On the other hand Frequency Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.1%. Given that Frequency Electronics has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe Frequency Electronics is more attractive than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.696, which suggesting that the stock is 69.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.139%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Frequency Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Frequency Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are larger than Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues of $20M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than Frequency Electronics's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.53x while Frequency Electronics's PE ratio is 8.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 5.28x versus 2.95x for Frequency Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 10.78%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $96.10, signalling upside risk potential of 2.33%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $134.18 which suggests that it could fall by -1.62%. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Itron.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.696, which suggesting that the stock is 69.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.774%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are larger than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.53x while Itron's PE ratio is 24.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 5.28x versus 2.57x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 5.56%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat MKS's return on equity of 9.72%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $96.10, signalling upside risk potential of 2.33%. On the other hand MKS has an analysts' consensus of $117.22 which suggests that it could grow by 11.95%. Given that MKS has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe MKS is more attractive than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.696, which suggesting that the stock is 69.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS has a beta of 1.876, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.593%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. MKS offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS pays out 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are smaller than MKS quarterly revenues of $936M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than MKS's net income of $52M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.53x while MKS's PE ratio is 31.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 5.28x versus 1.94x for MKS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 42.61%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $96.10, signalling upside risk potential of 2.33%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.55 which suggests that it could grow by 4.14%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.696, which suggesting that the stock is 69.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.53x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 5.28x versus 28.71x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.