SHIP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euroseas has a net margin of -28.35% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net margin of 65.52%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 10.37% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 38.46%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling upside risk potential of 62.68%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $58.33 which suggests that it could grow by 18.04%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than Euroseas, analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings is more attractive than Euroseas.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.178%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.71%. Euroseas offers a yield of 4.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.2M, which are smaller than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $56.3M. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Euroseas's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Seanergy Maritime Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.35x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 2.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seanergy Maritime Holdings is 0.89x versus 1.55x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

StealthGas has a net margin of -28.35% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net margin of 33.57%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 10.37% beat StealthGas's return on equity of 10.88%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling upside risk potential of 62.68%. On the other hand StealthGas has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.37%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than StealthGas, analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings is more attractive than StealthGas.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison StealthGas has a beta of 0.367, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.269%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.71%. StealthGas offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. StealthGas pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.2M, which are smaller than StealthGas quarterly revenues of $42M. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of -$6.9M is lower than StealthGas's net income of $14.1M. Notably, Seanergy Maritime Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.35x while StealthGas's PE ratio is 3.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seanergy Maritime Holdings is 0.89x versus 1.38x for StealthGas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globus Maritime has a net margin of -28.35% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net margin of -17.2%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 10.37% beat Globus Maritime's return on equity of -0.43%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling upside risk potential of 62.68%. On the other hand Globus Maritime has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 165.49%. Given that Globus Maritime has higher upside potential than Seanergy Maritime Holdings, analysts believe Globus Maritime is more attractive than Seanergy Maritime Holdings.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globus Maritime has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.316%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.71%. Globus Maritime offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Globus Maritime pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.2M, which are larger than Globus Maritime quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Globus Maritime's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Seanergy Maritime Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.35x while Globus Maritime's PE ratio is 64.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seanergy Maritime Holdings is 0.89x versus 0.65x for Globus Maritime. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of -28.35% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net margin of 0.2%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 10.37% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 10.93%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.06, signalling upside risk potential of 62.68%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $20.22 which suggests that it could grow by 8.94%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than Star Bulk Carriers, analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings is more attractive than Star Bulk Carriers.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.284, which suggesting that the stock is 71.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.262%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.71%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 7.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.2M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $230.7M. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $462K. Notably, Seanergy Maritime Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.35x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 9.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seanergy Maritime Holdings is 0.89x versus 1.76x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.