SGML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nuinsco Resources has a net margin of 9.92% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of --. Sigma Lithium's return on equity of -31.41% beat Nuinsco Resources's return on equity of --.

Sigma Lithium has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.45%. On the other hand Nuinsco Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sigma Lithium has higher upside potential than Nuinsco Resources, analysts believe Sigma Lithium is more attractive than Nuinsco Resources.

Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuinsco Resources has a beta of 0.016, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.449%.

Sigma Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuinsco Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sigma Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuinsco Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sigma Lithium quarterly revenues are $47.7M, which are larger than Nuinsco Resources quarterly revenues of --. Sigma Lithium's net income of $4.7M is higher than Nuinsco Resources's net income of -$64.5K. Notably, Sigma Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.98x while Nuinsco Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sigma Lithium is 4.75x versus -- for Nuinsco Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rare Element Resources has a net margin of 9.92% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of --. Sigma Lithium's return on equity of -31.41% beat Rare Element Resources's return on equity of --.

Sigma Lithium has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.45%. On the other hand Rare Element Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 154.41%. Given that Rare Element Resources has higher upside potential than Sigma Lithium, analysts believe Rare Element Resources is more attractive than Sigma Lithium.

Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rare Element Resources has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.987%.

Sigma Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rare Element Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sigma Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rare Element Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sigma Lithium quarterly revenues are $47.7M, which are larger than Rare Element Resources quarterly revenues of --. Sigma Lithium's net income of $4.7M is higher than Rare Element Resources's net income of --. Notably, Sigma Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.98x while Rare Element Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sigma Lithium is 4.75x versus -- for Rare Element Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TMC The Metals has a net margin of 9.92% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of --. Sigma Lithium's return on equity of -31.41% beat TMC The Metals's return on equity of --.

Sigma Lithium has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.45%. On the other hand TMC The Metals has an analysts' consensus of $8.85 which suggests that it could grow by 15.84%. Given that Sigma Lithium has higher upside potential than TMC The Metals, analysts believe Sigma Lithium is more attractive than TMC The Metals.

Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TMC The Metals has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.014%.

Sigma Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TMC The Metals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sigma Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TMC The Metals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sigma Lithium quarterly revenues are $47.7M, which are larger than TMC The Metals quarterly revenues of --. Sigma Lithium's net income of $4.7M is higher than TMC The Metals's net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Sigma Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.98x while TMC The Metals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sigma Lithium is 4.75x versus -- for TMC The Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winston Gold has a net margin of 9.92% compared to Sigma Lithium's net margin of --. Sigma Lithium's return on equity of -31.41% beat Winston Gold's return on equity of --.

Sigma Lithium has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.45%. On the other hand Winston Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sigma Lithium has higher upside potential than Winston Gold, analysts believe Sigma Lithium is more attractive than Winston Gold.

Sigma Lithium has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winston Gold has a beta of 0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.542%.

Sigma Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winston Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sigma Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winston Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sigma Lithium quarterly revenues are $47.7M, which are larger than Winston Gold quarterly revenues of --. Sigma Lithium's net income of $4.7M is higher than Winston Gold's net income of --. Notably, Sigma Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.98x while Winston Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sigma Lithium is 4.75x versus -- for Winston Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.