Is Bloom Energy Flying Under the Radar?
Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) manufactures scalable fuel cells for providing on-site…
Buy
66
PECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$34.94
Seasonality move
:
-1.13%
Day range:
$34.55 - $35.18
52-week range:
$32.40 - $40.12
Dividend yield:
3.51%
P/E ratio:
61.28x
P/S ratio:
7.07x
P/B ratio:
1.90x
Volume:
880.9K
Avg. volume:
759.5K
1-year change:
-0.88%
Market cap:
$4.4B
Revenue:
$661.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.57
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PECO
Phillips Edison &
|
$173.8M | $0.15 | 7.96% | 25% | $39.09 |
|
AEI
Alset
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHCI
Comstock Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EXPI
eXp World Holdings
|
$1.3B | $0.12 | 0.82% | 62.5% | $12.00 |
|
FRPH
FRP Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SGD
Safe & Green Development
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PECO
Phillips Edison &
|
$34.93 | $39.09 | $4.4B | 61.28x | $0.10 | 3.51% | 7.07x |
|
AEI
Alset
|
$1.25 | -- | $14.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.75x |
|
CHCI
Comstock Holding
|
$12.63 | -- | $127.2M | 8.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.46x |
|
EXPI
eXp World Holdings
|
$9.91 | $12.00 | $1.5B | -- | $0.05 | 2.02% | 0.33x |
|
FRPH
FRP Holdings
|
$26.94 | -- | $514.2M | 74.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 12.19x |
|
SGD
Safe & Green Development
|
$0.89 | -- | $2.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.86x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PECO
Phillips Edison &
|
49.63% | 0.460 | 46.62% | 0.39x |
|
AEI
Alset
|
1.58% | 1.074 | 6.44% | 10.90x |
|
CHCI
Comstock Holding
|
-- | -1.993 | -- | 10.46x |
|
EXPI
eXp World Holdings
|
-- | 0.997 | -- | 0.98x |
|
FRPH
FRP Holdings
|
29.54% | 0.986 | 30.7% | 18.76x |
|
SGD
Safe & Green Development
|
98.59% | 0.070 | 339.86% | 0.46x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PECO
Phillips Edison &
|
$127.3M | $49.8M | 1.51% | 2.73% | 30.6% | $34.2M |
|
AEI
Alset
|
$290.8K | -$3.3M | -6.1% | -6.2% | -880.91% | -$3.8M |
|
CHCI
Comstock Holding
|
$2.4M | $1.7M | 33.88% | 33.88% | 13.74% | $419K |
|
EXPI
eXp World Holdings
|
$76.1M | -$10.4M | -7.78% | -7.78% | -1.09% | $36.8M |
|
FRPH
FRP Holdings
|
$9.4M | $2.3M | 1.07% | 1.48% | 27.7% | $4.5M |
|
SGD
Safe & Green Development
|
$6.4K | -$1.3M | -79.34% | -612.91% | -6743.78% | -$561.9K |
Phillips Edison & vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PECO or AEI?
Alset has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Phillips Edison &'s net margin of -780.07%. Phillips Edison &'s return on equity of 2.73% beat Alset's return on equity of -6.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PECOPhillips Edison &71.39% $0.21 $4.9B AEIAlset27.22% -$0.78 $86M -
What do Analysts Say About PECO or AEI?
Phillips Edison & has a consensus price target of $39.09, signalling upside risk potential of 11.91%. On the other hand Alset has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Phillips Edison & has higher upside potential than Alset, analysts believe Phillips Edison & is more attractive than Alset.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PECOPhillips Edison &5 7 0 AEIAlset0 0 0 -
Is PECO or AEI More Risky?
Phillips Edison & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alset has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PECO or AEI?
Phillips Edison & has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Alset offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phillips Edison & pays 213.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Alset pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PECO or AEI?
Phillips Edison & quarterly revenues are $178.3M, which are larger than Alset quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Phillips Edison &'s net income of $26.3M is higher than Alset's net income of -$8.3M. Notably, Phillips Edison &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.28x while Alset's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & is 7.07x versus 0.75x for Alset. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PECOPhillips Edison &7.07x 61.28x $178.3M $26.3M AEIAlset0.75x -- $1.1M -$8.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns PECO or CHCI?
Comstock Holding has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Phillips Edison &'s net margin of 12.57%. Phillips Edison &'s return on equity of 2.73% beat Comstock Holding's return on equity of 33.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PECOPhillips Edison &71.39% $0.21 $4.9B CHCIComstock Holding18.61% $0.15 $53.7M -
What do Analysts Say About PECO or CHCI?
Phillips Edison & has a consensus price target of $39.09, signalling upside risk potential of 11.91%. On the other hand Comstock Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -44.58%. Given that Phillips Edison & has higher upside potential than Comstock Holding, analysts believe Phillips Edison & is more attractive than Comstock Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PECOPhillips Edison &5 7 0 CHCIComstock Holding0 0 0 -
Is PECO or CHCI More Risky?
Phillips Edison & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.652%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PECO or CHCI?
Phillips Edison & has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Comstock Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phillips Edison & pays 213.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PECO or CHCI?
Phillips Edison & quarterly revenues are $178.3M, which are larger than Comstock Holding quarterly revenues of $12.6M. Phillips Edison &'s net income of $26.3M is higher than Comstock Holding's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Phillips Edison &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.28x while Comstock Holding's PE ratio is 8.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & is 7.07x versus 2.46x for Comstock Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PECOPhillips Edison &7.07x 61.28x $178.3M $26.3M CHCIComstock Holding2.46x 8.65x $12.6M $1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns PECO or EXPI?
eXp World Holdings has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Phillips Edison &'s net margin of -1.16%. Phillips Edison &'s return on equity of 2.73% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -7.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PECOPhillips Edison &71.39% $0.21 $4.9B EXPIeXp World Holdings7.97% -$0.07 $212M -
What do Analysts Say About PECO or EXPI?
Phillips Edison & has a consensus price target of $39.09, signalling upside risk potential of 11.91%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.09%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison &, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than Phillips Edison &.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PECOPhillips Edison &5 7 0 EXPIeXp World Holdings1 1 0 -
Is PECO or EXPI More Risky?
Phillips Edison & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.082%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PECO or EXPI?
Phillips Edison & has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Phillips Edison & pays 213.8% of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -141.53% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PECO or EXPI?
Phillips Edison & quarterly revenues are $178.3M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $954.9M. Phillips Edison &'s net income of $26.3M is higher than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$11M. Notably, Phillips Edison &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.28x while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & is 7.07x versus 0.33x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PECOPhillips Edison &7.07x 61.28x $178.3M $26.3M EXPIeXp World Holdings0.33x -- $954.9M -$11M
-
Which has Higher Returns PECO or FRPH?
FRP Holdings has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Phillips Edison &'s net margin of 16.59%. Phillips Edison &'s return on equity of 2.73% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PECOPhillips Edison &71.39% $0.21 $4.9B FRPHFRP Holdings90.9% $0.09 $638.7M -
What do Analysts Say About PECO or FRPH?
Phillips Edison & has a consensus price target of $39.09, signalling upside risk potential of 11.91%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Phillips Edison & has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Phillips Edison & is more attractive than FRP Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PECOPhillips Edison &5 7 0 FRPHFRP Holdings0 0 0 -
Is PECO or FRPH More Risky?
Phillips Edison & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.385%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PECO or FRPH?
Phillips Edison & has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phillips Edison & pays 213.8% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PECO or FRPH?
Phillips Edison & quarterly revenues are $178.3M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Phillips Edison &'s net income of $26.3M is higher than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Phillips Edison &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.28x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 74.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & is 7.07x versus 12.19x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PECOPhillips Edison &7.07x 61.28x $178.3M $26.3M FRPHFRP Holdings12.19x 74.83x $10.3M $1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns PECO or SGD?
Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Phillips Edison &'s net margin of -11997.76%. Phillips Edison &'s return on equity of 2.73% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of -612.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PECOPhillips Edison &71.39% $0.21 $4.9B SGDSafe & Green Development35.06% -$1.03 $9.8M -
What do Analysts Say About PECO or SGD?
Phillips Edison & has a consensus price target of $39.09, signalling upside risk potential of 11.91%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Phillips Edison & has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Phillips Edison & is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PECOPhillips Edison &5 7 0 SGDSafe & Green Development0 0 0 -
Is PECO or SGD More Risky?
Phillips Edison & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PECO or SGD?
Phillips Edison & has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phillips Edison & pays 213.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PECO or SGD?
Phillips Edison & quarterly revenues are $178.3M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $18.2K. Phillips Edison &'s net income of $26.3M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Phillips Edison &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.28x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & is 7.07x versus 6.86x for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PECOPhillips Edison &7.07x 61.28x $178.3M $26.3M SGDSafe & Green Development6.86x -- $18.2K -$2.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
61
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
55
TLN alert for Jul 19
Talen Energy [TLN] is up 24.44% over the past day.
Sell
48
CRSP alert for Jul 19
CRISPR Therapeutics AG [CRSP] is up 18.22% over the past day.
Buy
83
SOC alert for Jul 19
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
