OP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euroseas has a net margin of -2.16% compared to OceanPal's net margin of 65.52%. OceanPal's return on equity of -10.63% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 38.46%.

OceanPal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $58.33 which suggests that it could grow by 18.04%. Given that Euroseas has higher upside potential than OceanPal, analysts believe Euroseas is more attractive than OceanPal.

OceanPal has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.178%.

OceanPal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euroseas offers a yield of 4.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. OceanPal pays -9.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OceanPal quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $56.3M. OceanPal's net income of -$162K is lower than Euroseas's net income of $36.9M. Notably, OceanPal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Euroseas's PE ratio is 2.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OceanPal is 0.48x versus 1.55x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

StealthGas has a net margin of -2.16% compared to OceanPal's net margin of 33.57%. OceanPal's return on equity of -10.63% beat StealthGas's return on equity of 10.88%.

OceanPal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand StealthGas has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.37%. Given that StealthGas has higher upside potential than OceanPal, analysts believe StealthGas is more attractive than OceanPal.

OceanPal has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison StealthGas has a beta of 0.367, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.269%.

OceanPal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. StealthGas offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OceanPal pays -9.16% of its earnings as a dividend. StealthGas pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

OceanPal quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than StealthGas quarterly revenues of $42M. OceanPal's net income of -$162K is lower than StealthGas's net income of $14.1M. Notably, OceanPal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while StealthGas's PE ratio is 3.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OceanPal is 0.48x versus 1.38x for StealthGas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of -2.16% compared to OceanPal's net margin of 0.2%. OceanPal's return on equity of -10.63% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 10.93%.

OceanPal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $20.22 which suggests that it could grow by 8.94%. Given that Star Bulk Carriers has higher upside potential than OceanPal, analysts believe Star Bulk Carriers is more attractive than OceanPal.

OceanPal has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.262%.

OceanPal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 7.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. OceanPal pays -9.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OceanPal quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $230.7M. OceanPal's net income of -$162K is lower than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $462K. Notably, OceanPal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 9.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OceanPal is 0.48x versus 1.76x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a net margin of -2.16% compared to OceanPal's net margin of -28.35%. OceanPal's return on equity of -10.63% beat Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 10.37%.

OceanPal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seanergy Maritime Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.06 which suggests that it could grow by 62.68%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than OceanPal, analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings is more attractive than OceanPal.

OceanPal has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.284, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.59%.

OceanPal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings offers a yield of 9.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. OceanPal pays -9.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays out 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OceanPal quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues of $24.2M. OceanPal's net income of -$162K is higher than Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of -$6.9M. Notably, OceanPal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seanergy Maritime Holdings's PE ratio is 5.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OceanPal is 0.48x versus 0.89x for Seanergy Maritime Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.