MRTN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Landstar System has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Marten Transport's net margin of 2.59%. Marten Transport's return on equity of 2.72% beat Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09%.

Marten Transport has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Landstar System has an analysts' consensus of $141.48 which suggests that it could grow by 3.82%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Landstar System.

Marten Transport has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.855%.

Marten Transport has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Landstar System offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Marten Transport pays 72.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System pays out 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marten Transport quarterly revenues are $229.9M, which are smaller than Landstar System quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Marten Transport's net income of $7.2M is lower than Landstar System's net income of $29.8M. Notably, Marten Transport's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.04x while Landstar System's PE ratio is 26.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marten Transport is 1.13x versus 1.00x for Landstar System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Marten Transport's net margin of 18.52%. Marten Transport's return on equity of 2.72% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 27.13%.

Marten Transport has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line has an analysts' consensus of $168.35 which suggests that it could grow by 3.86%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Old Dominion Freight Line, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Old Dominion Freight Line.

Marten Transport has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.368%.

Marten Transport has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Old Dominion Freight Line offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Marten Transport pays 72.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 18.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marten Transport quarterly revenues are $229.9M, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Marten Transport's net income of $7.2M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line's net income of $254.7M. Notably, Marten Transport's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.04x while Old Dominion Freight Line's PE ratio is 30.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marten Transport is 1.13x versus 6.09x for Old Dominion Freight Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saia has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Marten Transport's net margin of 6.33%. Marten Transport's return on equity of 2.72% beat Saia's return on equity of 14.51%.

Marten Transport has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Saia has an analysts' consensus of $298.15 which suggests that it could grow by 3.49%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Saia, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Saia.

Marten Transport has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saia has a beta of 1.980, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.966%.

Marten Transport has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Saia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marten Transport pays 72.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Saia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marten Transport quarterly revenues are $229.9M, which are smaller than Saia quarterly revenues of $787.6M. Marten Transport's net income of $7.2M is lower than Saia's net income of $49.8M. Notably, Marten Transport's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.04x while Saia's PE ratio is 24.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marten Transport is 1.13x versus 2.38x for Saia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Marten Transport's net margin of 1.57%. Marten Transport's return on equity of 2.72% beat Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39%.

Marten Transport has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Universal Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Universal Logistics Holdings, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Universal Logistics Holdings.

Marten Transport has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.67200000000001%.

Marten Transport has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Universal Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Marten Transport pays 72.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings pays out 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marten Transport quarterly revenues are $229.9M, which are smaller than Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of $382.4M. Marten Transport's net income of $7.2M is higher than Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M. Notably, Marten Transport's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.04x while Universal Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is 7.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marten Transport is 1.13x versus 0.38x for Universal Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.