LSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 1.68%. Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09% beat Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's return on equity of 2.13%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $141.48, signalling upside risk potential of 3.82%. On the other hand Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $52.04 which suggests that it could grow by 16.52%. Given that Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.268%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings pays out 88.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Landstar System's net income of $29.8M is lower than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net income of $30.6M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.98x while Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's PE ratio is 47.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.00x versus 0.98x for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marten Transport has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 3.13%. Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09% beat Marten Transport's return on equity of 2.72%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $141.48, signalling upside risk potential of 3.82%. On the other hand Marten Transport has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.65%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.403%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Marten Transport offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport pays out 72.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Marten Transport quarterly revenues of $229.9M. Landstar System's net income of $29.8M is higher than Marten Transport's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.98x while Marten Transport's PE ratio is 49.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.00x versus 1.13x for Marten Transport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 1.57%. Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09% beat Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $141.48, signalling upside risk potential of 3.82%. On the other hand Universal Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.67200000000001%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Universal Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings pays out 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of $382.4M. Landstar System's net income of $29.8M is higher than Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.98x while Universal Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is 7.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.00x versus 0.38x for Universal Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Werner Enterprises has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Landstar System's net margin of -1.42%. Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09% beat Werner Enterprises's return on equity of 1.19%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $141.48, signalling upside risk potential of 3.82%. On the other hand Werner Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $28.40 which suggests that it could grow by 2.42%. Given that Landstar System has higher upside potential than Werner Enterprises, analysts believe Landstar System is more attractive than Werner Enterprises.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Werner Enterprises has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.193%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Werner Enterprises offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Werner Enterprises pays out 102.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Werner Enterprises's is not.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Werner Enterprises quarterly revenues of $712.1M. Landstar System's net income of $29.8M is higher than Werner Enterprises's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.98x while Werner Enterprises's PE ratio is 95.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.00x versus 0.58x for Werner Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.