LQDT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 6.06% compared to Liquidity Services's net margin of --. Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.32%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidity Services has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Liquidity Services is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Liquidity Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidity Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidity Services quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Liquidity Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.39x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services is 1.80x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of 6.06% compared to Liquidity Services's net margin of 5.17%. Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96% beat Envela's return on equity of 14.21%.

Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.32%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 63.51%. Given that Liquidity Services has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe Liquidity Services is more attractive than Envela.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.122, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.8%.

Liquidity Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidity Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidity Services quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $48.3M. Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M is higher than Envela's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Liquidity Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.39x while Envela's PE ratio is 20.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services is 1.80x versus 0.80x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of 6.06% compared to Liquidity Services's net margin of -53.78%. Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96% beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -38.44%.

Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.32%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 74.76%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Liquidity Services, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Liquidity Services.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.479, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.898%.

Liquidity Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidity Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidity Services quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are smaller than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $331.5M. Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M is higher than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$178.2M. Notably, Liquidity Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.39x while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services is 1.80x versus 0.19x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steelcase has a net margin of 6.06% compared to Liquidity Services's net margin of 1.75%. Liquidity Services's return on equity of 13.96% beat Steelcase's return on equity of 13.2%.

Liquidity Services has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 65.32%. On the other hand Steelcase has an analysts' consensus of $16.25 which suggests that it could grow by 59.94%. Given that Liquidity Services has higher upside potential than Steelcase, analysts believe Liquidity Services is more attractive than Steelcase.

Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steelcase has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.742%.

Liquidity Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steelcase offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Liquidity Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steelcase pays out 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Steelcase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Liquidity Services quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are smaller than Steelcase quarterly revenues of $779M. Liquidity Services's net income of $7.1M is lower than Steelcase's net income of $13.6M. Notably, Liquidity Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.39x while Steelcase's PE ratio is 9.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services is 1.80x versus 0.37x for Steelcase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.