LIVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Envela has a net margin of 14.83% compared to Live Ventures's net margin of 5.17%. Live Ventures's return on equity of -7.51% beat Envela's return on equity of 14.21%.

Live Ventures has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 927.55%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 63.51%. Given that Live Ventures has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe Live Ventures is more attractive than Envela.

Live Ventures has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.122, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.8%.

Live Ventures has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Live Ventures pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Live Ventures quarterly revenues are $107M, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $48.3M. Live Ventures's net income of $15.9M is higher than Envela's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Live Ventures's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envela's PE ratio is 20.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Live Ventures is 0.09x versus 0.80x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RH has a net margin of 14.83% compared to Live Ventures's net margin of 0.99%. Live Ventures's return on equity of -7.51% beat RH's return on equity of --.

Live Ventures has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 927.55%. On the other hand RH has an analysts' consensus of $257.24 which suggests that it could grow by 31.59%. Given that Live Ventures has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Live Ventures is more attractive than RH.

Live Ventures has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RH has a beta of 2.171, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.075%.

Live Ventures has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RH offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Live Ventures pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Live Ventures quarterly revenues are $107M, which are smaller than RH quarterly revenues of $814M. Live Ventures's net income of $15.9M is higher than RH's net income of $8M. Notably, Live Ventures's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RH's PE ratio is 46.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Live Ventures is 0.09x versus 1.20x for RH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tile Shop Holdings has a net margin of 14.83% compared to Live Ventures's net margin of 0.2%. Live Ventures's return on equity of -7.51% beat Tile Shop Holdings's return on equity of 0.66%.

Live Ventures has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 927.55%. On the other hand Tile Shop Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.85%. Given that Live Ventures has higher upside potential than Tile Shop Holdings, analysts believe Live Ventures is more attractive than Tile Shop Holdings.

Live Ventures has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tile Shop Holdings has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.482%.

Live Ventures has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tile Shop Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Live Ventures pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tile Shop Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Live Ventures quarterly revenues are $107M, which are larger than Tile Shop Holdings quarterly revenues of $88M. Live Ventures's net income of $15.9M is higher than Tile Shop Holdings's net income of $172K. Notably, Live Ventures's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tile Shop Holdings's PE ratio is 329.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Live Ventures is 0.09x versus 0.88x for Tile Shop Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 14.83% compared to Live Ventures's net margin of 13.37%. Live Ventures's return on equity of -7.51% beat Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 51.12%.

Live Ventures has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 927.55%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma has an analysts' consensus of $177.52 which suggests that it could grow by 4.18%. Given that Live Ventures has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Live Ventures is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Live Ventures has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.547%.

Live Ventures has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Live Ventures pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma pays out 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Live Ventures quarterly revenues are $107M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Live Ventures's net income of $15.9M is lower than Williams-Sonoma's net income of $231.3M. Notably, Live Ventures's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Williams-Sonoma's PE ratio is 19.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Live Ventures is 0.09x versus 2.77x for Williams-Sonoma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.