LE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of -3.16% compared to Lands' End's net margin of 7.33%. Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91% beat Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 43.48%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.35%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch has an analysts' consensus of $113.37 which suggests that it could grow by 21.29%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Abercrombie & Fitch, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Abercrombie & Fitch.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.482, which suggesting that the stock is 148.21% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.53%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abercrombie & Fitch offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $261.2M, which are smaller than Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Abercrombie & Fitch's net income of $80.4M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.15x while Abercrombie & Fitch's PE ratio is 9.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.29x versus 0.97x for Abercrombie & Fitch. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Destination XL Group has a net margin of -3.16% compared to Lands' End's net margin of -1.84%. Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91% beat Destination XL Group's return on equity of -1.81%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.35%. On the other hand Destination XL Group has an analysts' consensus of $1.65 which suggests that it could grow by 25.95%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Destination XL Group, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Destination XL Group.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.482, which suggesting that the stock is 148.21% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Destination XL Group has a beta of 0.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.503%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Destination XL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Destination XL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $261.2M, which are larger than Destination XL Group quarterly revenues of $105.5M. Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Destination XL Group's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.15x while Destination XL Group's PE ratio is 26.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.29x versus 0.16x for Destination XL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of -3.16% compared to Lands' End's net margin of 9.61%. Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 39.39%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.35%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $151.01 which suggests that it could grow by 16.22%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Ross Stores, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Ross Stores.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.482, which suggesting that the stock is 148.21% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.014%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 23.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $261.2M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5B. Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $479.2M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.15x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.29x versus 2.01x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of -3.16% compared to Lands' End's net margin of 8.15%. Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.35%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $73.15 which suggests that it could grow by 1.4%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.482, which suggesting that the stock is 148.21% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.983%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $261.2M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.15x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.29x versus 1.19x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.