HSII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GEE Group has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Heidrick & Struggles International's net margin of -135.21%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 1.72% beat GEE Group's return on equity of -67.45%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a consensus price target of $51.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.23%. On the other hand GEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 854.2%. Given that GEE Group has higher upside potential than Heidrick & Struggles International, analysts believe GEE Group is more attractive than Heidrick & Struggles International.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GEE Group has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.192%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. GEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Heidrick & Struggles International pays 148.06% of its earnings as a dividend. GEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Heidrick & Struggles International quarterly revenues are $287.4M, which are larger than GEE Group quarterly revenues of $24.5M. Heidrick & Struggles International's net income of $13.3M is higher than GEE Group's net income of -$33.1M. Notably, Heidrick & Struggles International's price-to-earnings ratio is 131.86x while GEE Group's PE ratio is 6.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidrick & Struggles International is 0.85x versus 0.21x for GEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kelly Services has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Heidrick & Struggles International's net margin of 0.5%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 1.72% beat Kelly Services's return on equity of -1.63%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a consensus price target of $51.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.23%. On the other hand Kelly Services has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 114.97%. Given that Kelly Services has higher upside potential than Heidrick & Struggles International, analysts believe Kelly Services is more attractive than Heidrick & Struggles International.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kelly Services has a beta of 0.950, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.008%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Kelly Services offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Heidrick & Struggles International pays 148.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Kelly Services pays out -1816.67% of its earnings as a dividend.

Heidrick & Struggles International quarterly revenues are $287.4M, which are smaller than Kelly Services quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Heidrick & Struggles International's net income of $13.3M is higher than Kelly Services's net income of $5.8M. Notably, Heidrick & Struggles International's price-to-earnings ratio is 131.86x while Kelly Services's PE ratio is 12.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidrick & Struggles International is 0.85x versus 0.10x for Kelly Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastech Digital has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Heidrick & Struggles International's net margin of -2.98%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 1.72% beat Mastech Digital's return on equity of 2.49%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a consensus price target of $51.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.23%. On the other hand Mastech Digital has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 72.11%. Given that Mastech Digital has higher upside potential than Heidrick & Struggles International, analysts believe Mastech Digital is more attractive than Heidrick & Struggles International.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastech Digital has a beta of 0.731, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.893%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Mastech Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Heidrick & Struggles International pays 148.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastech Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Heidrick & Struggles International quarterly revenues are $287.4M, which are larger than Mastech Digital quarterly revenues of $48.3M. Heidrick & Struggles International's net income of $13.3M is higher than Mastech Digital's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Heidrick & Struggles International's price-to-earnings ratio is 131.86x while Mastech Digital's PE ratio is 44.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidrick & Struggles International is 0.85x versus 0.48x for Mastech Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Staffing 360 Solutions has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Heidrick & Struggles International's net margin of -6.17%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 1.72% beat Staffing 360 Solutions's return on equity of -1477.9%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a consensus price target of $51.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.23%. On the other hand Staffing 360 Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 271.52%. Given that Staffing 360 Solutions has higher upside potential than Heidrick & Struggles International, analysts believe Staffing 360 Solutions is more attractive than Heidrick & Struggles International.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Staffing 360 Solutions has a beta of -0.127, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.651%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Staffing 360 Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Heidrick & Struggles International pays 148.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Staffing 360 Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Heidrick & Struggles International quarterly revenues are $287.4M, which are larger than Staffing 360 Solutions quarterly revenues of $46.1M. Heidrick & Struggles International's net income of $13.3M is higher than Staffing 360 Solutions's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Heidrick & Struggles International's price-to-earnings ratio is 131.86x while Staffing 360 Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidrick & Struggles International is 0.85x versus 0.01x for Staffing 360 Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.