FEIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohu has a net margin of 16.57% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of -31.82%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 54.9% beat Cohu's return on equity of -9.81%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.1%. On the other hand Cohu has an analysts' consensus of $24.75 which suggests that it could grow by 25.95%. Given that Cohu has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Cohu is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.469, which suggesting that the stock is 53.139% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohu has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.953%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cohu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cohu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $20M, which are smaller than Cohu quarterly revenues of $96.8M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $3.3M is higher than Cohu's net income of -$30.8M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Cohu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.95x versus 2.35x for Cohu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 16.57% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of -2.86%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 54.9% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 2.64%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.1%. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Frequency Electronics has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Frequency Electronics is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.469, which suggesting that the stock is 53.139% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.236, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.351%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $20M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $3.3M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of -$64K. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 42.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.95x versus 1.69x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 16.57% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 10.78%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 54.9% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.1%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $134.18 which suggests that it could fall by -1.62%. Given that Frequency Electronics has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Frequency Electronics is more attractive than Itron.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.469, which suggesting that the stock is 53.139% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.774%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $20M, which are smaller than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $3.3M is lower than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Itron's PE ratio is 24.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.95x versus 2.57x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS has a net margin of 16.57% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 5.56%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 54.9% beat MKS's return on equity of 9.72%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.1%. On the other hand MKS has an analysts' consensus of $117.22 which suggests that it could grow by 11.95%. Given that Frequency Electronics has higher upside potential than MKS, analysts believe Frequency Electronics is more attractive than MKS.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.469, which suggesting that the stock is 53.139% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS has a beta of 1.876, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.593%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MKS offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS pays out 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $20M, which are smaller than MKS quarterly revenues of $936M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $3.3M is lower than MKS's net income of $52M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while MKS's PE ratio is 31.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.95x versus 1.94x for MKS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.