EEIQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Covey has a net margin of -- compared to EpicQuest Education Group International's net margin of -2.1%. EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44% beat Franklin Covey's return on equity of 14.24%.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 335.01%. On the other hand Franklin Covey has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 70.72%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Franklin Covey, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Franklin Covey.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.46%.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EpicQuest Education Group International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Covey quarterly revenues of $67.1M. EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Covey's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, EpicQuest Education Group International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Covey's PE ratio is 24.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EpicQuest Education Group International is 0.78x versus 0.91x for Franklin Covey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Classover Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to EpicQuest Education Group International's net margin of -36.42%. EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44% beat Classover Holdings's return on equity of --.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 335.01%. On the other hand Classover Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Classover Holdings.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Classover Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Classover Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EpicQuest Education Group International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Classover Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Classover Holdings quarterly revenues of $816K. EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of -- is lower than Classover Holdings's net income of -$297.2K. Notably, EpicQuest Education Group International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Classover Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EpicQuest Education Group International is 0.78x versus 18.65x for Classover Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of -- compared to EpicQuest Education Group International's net margin of -8.26%. EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19%.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 335.01%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $24.88 which suggests that it could grow by 2.66%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Laureate Education.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.344%.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. EpicQuest Education Group International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $236.2M. EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of -- is lower than Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, EpicQuest Education Group International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 12.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EpicQuest Education Group International is 0.78x versus 2.40x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -- compared to EpicQuest Education Group International's net margin of 1.65%. EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 335.01%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.47%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.42%.

EpicQuest Education Group International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EpicQuest Education Group International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of -- is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, EpicQuest Education Group International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 58.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EpicQuest Education Group International is 0.78x versus 1.56x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.