CRDO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 33.09%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 8.81% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 18.85%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $89.39, signalling downside risk potential of -4.36%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $291.33 which suggests that it could grow by 2.82%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than Credo Technology Group Holding.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.433%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $170M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $15B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $36.6M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5B. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 346.19x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 106.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 37.30x versus 23.78x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FTC Solar has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of -18.36%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 8.81% beat FTC Solar's return on equity of -132.79%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $89.39, signalling downside risk potential of -4.36%. On the other hand FTC Solar has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could fall by -14.36%. Given that FTC Solar has more downside risk than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe Credo Technology Group Holding is more attractive than FTC Solar.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FTC Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FTC Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $170M, which are larger than FTC Solar quarterly revenues of $20.8M. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $36.6M is higher than FTC Solar's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 346.19x while FTC Solar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 37.30x versus 1.20x for FTC Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 9.39%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 8.81% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $89.39, signalling downside risk potential of -4.36%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $90.27 which suggests that it could grow by 20.93%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Credo Technology Group Holding.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.355%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $170M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $36.6M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 346.19x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 37.30x versus 9.97x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 21.52% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 42.61%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 8.81% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $89.39, signalling downside risk potential of -4.36%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.55 which suggests that it could grow by 4.14%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Credo Technology Group Holding.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $170M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $36.6M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 346.19x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 37.30x versus 28.71x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.