CART Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amazon.com has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 11%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat Amazon.com's return on equity of 25.28%.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $53.12, signalling upside risk potential of 8.16%. On the other hand Amazon.com has an analysts' consensus of $246.71 which suggests that it could grow by 9.1%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Maplebear, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Maplebear.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amazon.com has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.349%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amazon.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amazon.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are smaller than Amazon.com quarterly revenues of $155.7B. Maplebear's net income of $106M is lower than Amazon.com's net income of $17.1B. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.31x while Amazon.com's PE ratio is 36.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 4.07x versus 3.74x for Amazon.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DoorDash has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 6.37%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat DoorDash's return on equity of 4.47%.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $53.12, signalling upside risk potential of 8.16%. On the other hand DoorDash has an analysts' consensus of $233.62 which suggests that it could fall by -2.32%. Given that Maplebear has higher upside potential than DoorDash, analysts believe Maplebear is more attractive than DoorDash.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoorDash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoorDash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoorDash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are smaller than DoorDash quarterly revenues of $3B. Maplebear's net income of $106M is lower than DoorDash's net income of $193M. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.31x while DoorDash's PE ratio is 306.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 4.07x versus 9.39x for DoorDash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 53.93%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $53.12, signalling upside risk potential of 8.16%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $348.30 which suggests that it could grow by 5.76%. Given that Maplebear has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Maplebear is more attractive than Wingstop.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.842, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.175%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $171.1M. Maplebear's net income of $106M is higher than Wingstop's net income of $92.3M. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.31x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 55.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 4.07x versus 14.74x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Resorts has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Maplebear's net margin of 4.28%. Maplebear's return on equity of 14.13% beat Wynn Resorts's return on equity of --.

Maplebear has a consensus price target of $53.12, signalling upside risk potential of 8.16%. On the other hand Wynn Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $116.64 which suggests that it could grow by 9.24%. Given that Wynn Resorts has higher upside potential than Maplebear, analysts believe Wynn Resorts is more attractive than Maplebear.

Maplebear has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.839%.

Maplebear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wynn Resorts offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Maplebear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maplebear quarterly revenues are $897M, which are smaller than Wynn Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Maplebear's net income of $106M is higher than Wynn Resorts's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Maplebear's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.31x while Wynn Resorts's PE ratio is 29.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear is 4.07x versus 1.67x for Wynn Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.